Department of Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Analytical Sciences, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China.
Analyst. 2010 Nov;135(11):2970-8. doi: 10.1039/c0an00265h. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
Serum samples from kidney cancer patients and healthy controls were analyzed by both direct infusion mass spectrometry (DIMS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with a high resolution ESI-Q-TOFMS. The classification and biomarker discovery capacities of the two methods were compared, and MS/MS experiments were carried out to identify potential biomarkers. DIMS had comparable classification and prediction capabilities to LC-MS but consumed only ~5% of the analysis time. With regard to biomarker discovery, twenty-three variables were found as potential biomarkers by DIMS, and 48 variables were obtained by LC-MS. DIMS is recommended to be a fast diagnostic method for kidney cancer, while LC-MS is necessary when comprehensive screening of biomarkers is required.
采用直接进样质谱(DIMS)和高效液相色谱-质谱联用(LC-MS)结合高分辨率 ESI-Q-TOFMS 对肾癌患者和健康对照者的血清样本进行分析。比较了两种方法的分类和生物标志物发现能力,并进行了 MS/MS 实验以鉴定潜在的生物标志物。DIMS 具有与 LC-MS 相当的分类和预测能力,但仅消耗约 5%的分析时间。在生物标志物发现方面,DIMS 发现了 23 个潜在的生物标志物变量,而 LC-MS 则获得了 48 个变量。推荐 DIMS 作为肾癌的快速诊断方法,而当需要全面筛选生物标志物时则需要 LC-MS。