Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):44-9. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.514090. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
There is a developing body of literature documenting adverse survival outcome of out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation for critical multiple trauma and head injury patients.
To compare the rates of survival to hospital admission and discharge of nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who received successful out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation and those who were not intubated.
We conducted a retrospective analysis from an ongoing database of OHCA patients brought to a large suburban tertiary care emergency department by paramedic services between 1995 and 2006. We dichotomized patients by whether they were successfully endotracheally intubated or not prior to hospital arrival. Utstein style cardiac arrest variables were abstracted for all cases. All survivors to hospital admission were reviewed to exclude those patients in whom intubation was not attempted or unnecessary, such as those who had successful first-shock recovery of spontaneous circulation. We used chi square and logistic regression techniques for analysis, using survival to discharge as the primary outcome and survival to admission as a secondary outcome.
There were 1,515 total cases with 33 early survivors excluded. Overall, 1,220 (86.2%) were intubated; of those intubated, 270 (20.2%) survived to admission and 93 (7.0%) survived to discharge. Upon univariate analysis, there was no difference in survival between intubated and non intubated groups (6.5% vs 10.0%, OR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.37,1.08). For patients initially in ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VT/VF), in a multivariate Logit model, intubation significantly decreased survival to discharge, adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.27, 0.998). Intubated non-VF patients were more likely to survive to admission, adjusted OR 2.96 (1.04, 8.43), but not to discharge (1.8% vs. 1.0%, p = 1.0).
This observational study in an unselected population shows that patients in VF/VT arrest who underwent out-of-hospital intubation were less likely to survive to discharge than those not intubated. Out-of-hospital intubation of patients with non-VF arrest was associated with an increased rate of survival to admission, but not survival to discharge. Future prospective studies are needed to define the role of out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation in cardiac arrest patients.
比较接受成功的院外气管插管和未插管的非创伤性院外心搏骤停(OHCA)患者的入院和出院存活率。
我们对 1995 年至 2006 年间,由护理人员送往大型郊区三级护理急诊室的 OHCA 患者的正在进行的数据库进行了回顾性分析。我们根据患者在到达医院前是否成功进行气管内插管将患者分为两类。所有病例均提取了乌斯泰因(Utstein)样式的心脏骤停变量。所有入院幸存者均进行了复查,以排除那些未尝试或无需插管的患者,例如那些首次电击成功恢复自主循环的患者。我们使用卡方检验和逻辑回归技术进行分析,以出院存活率作为主要结局,以入院存活率作为次要结局。
共有 1515 例患者,其中 33 例早期幸存者被排除在外。总体而言,1220 例(86.2%)进行了插管;在插管的患者中,270 例(20.2%)存活至入院,93 例(7.0%)存活至出院。单因素分析显示,插管组与未插管组之间的存活率无差异(6.5% vs. 10.0%,OR=0.63,95%CI 0.37,1.08)。对于最初为心室颤动/室性心动过速(VF/VT)的患者,在多变量 Logit 模型中,气管插管显著降低了出院存活率,校正后的优势比(OR)为 0.52(95%置信区间 0.27,0.998)。非 VF 患者插管后更有可能存活至入院,校正后的优势比为 2.96(1.04,8.43),但无法存活至出院(1.8% vs. 1.0%,p=1.0)。
这项在未选择人群中进行的观察性研究表明,接受院外插管的 VF/VT 骤停患者的出院存活率低于未插管的患者。非 VF 骤停患者的院外插管与入院存活率的增加相关,但与出院存活率无关。未来需要前瞻性研究来确定院外气管插管在心脏骤停患者中的作用。