Borden E C, Rinehart J J, Storer B E, Trump D L, Paulnock D M, Teitelbaum A P
Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Clinical Cancer Center, Madison 53792.
J Interferon Res. 1990 Dec;10(6):559-70. doi: 10.1089/jir.1990.10.559.
To assess biological response, therapeutic activity, and side effects, a randomized, double-blind trial of two doses of interferon-beta ser (IFN-beta ser), differing by 20-fold 4.5 and 90 x 10(6) units), was undertaken in 64 patients with metastatic renal carcinoma. Patients were treated intravenously with injections daily for 10 days with an 11-day rest before treatment was reinitiated. The trial confirmed the relatively good toleration of IFN-beta ser; in the first cycle only 4/63 patients had anorexia of moderate or greater severity. Median weight change over the duration on study was -1.5 kg; in the first cycle only 7% of patients had performance status decline greater than 1 level. Statistically significant changes (p less than 0.05) occurred in granulocytes, lymphocytes, calcium, cholesterol, alkaline phosphatase, and aspartate transferase (AST); however, except for AST, overall clinical differences in the two doses were not great. Of 60 patients evaluated, 1 developed neutralizing antibody. When assessed 24 h after IFN-beta ser at 4.5 x 10(6) units, significant (p less than 0.05) augmentation had occurred in beta 2-microglobulin, HLA-DR, and HLA-DQ expression on monocytes, 2',5'-oligoadenylate (2-5A) synthetase in peripheral mononuclear cells, and natural killer (NK) and K cells functional activity. Although the 90 x 10(6) unit dose also resulted in stimulation of these responses, little additional augmentation of biological response occurred at the higher dose. Except for a decline in monocyte HLA-DR expression, biological responses remained increased at both doses over the 10-day period of treatment. However, no objective regressions of metastatic disease occurred. In view of objective responses in metastatic renal carcinoma in other trials with IFN-beta ser, consideration should be given to alternative schedules.
为评估生物反应、治疗活性及副作用,对64例转移性肾癌患者进行了一项随机双盲试验,比较两种剂量相差20倍(4.5×10⁶单位和90×10⁶单位)的干扰素β血清(IFN-β ser)。患者静脉注射,每日1次,共10天,治疗前休息11天,之后重新开始治疗。该试验证实IFN-β ser耐受性相对良好;在第一个疗程中,仅4/63例患者出现中度或更严重的厌食。研究期间体重变化中位数为-1.5 kg;在第一个疗程中,仅7%的患者体能状态下降超过1级。粒细胞、淋巴细胞、钙、胆固醇、碱性磷酸酶和天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)出现了具有统计学意义的变化(p<0.05);然而,除AST外,两种剂量的总体临床差异不大。在评估的60例患者中,1例产生了中和抗体。在给予4.5×10⁶单位IFN-β ser后24小时进行评估时,单核细胞上的β2-微球蛋白、HLA-DR和HLA-DQ表达显著增加(p<0.05),外周血单个核细胞中的2',5'-寡腺苷酸(2-5A)合成酶以及自然杀伤(NK)细胞和K细胞的功能活性也显著增加。尽管90×10⁶单位剂量也导致了这些反应的刺激,但在较高剂量下生物反应几乎没有额外增加。除单核细胞HLA-DR表达下降外,在10天的治疗期间,两种剂量的生物反应均保持增加。然而,转移性疾病未出现客观缓解。鉴于在其他使用IFN-β ser的试验中转移性肾癌有客观反应,应考虑采用其他给药方案。