• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Prioritisation in health care: what does it mean?].

作者信息

Hoppe Jörg-Dietrich

机构信息

Bundesärztekammer, Berlin.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(5):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.022. Epub 2010 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.022
PMID:20870495
Abstract

Coping with limited resources is one of the key challenges in patient care. Rationalisation reserves have already been exhausted in many areas. Particularly in the health sector, the question needs to be clarified as to how the limited resources can be allocated fairly from both the ethical and legal point of view. The medical community proposes that health care services be prioritised. In other words, priorities are defined in order to increase fair distribution in the health sector. In this context prioritisation does not mean the exclusion of medically necessary services, but grading the granting of services in accordance with the principles of priority. The advantages of prioritisation lie primarily in the transparency of the procedure and in the chance of achieving consistent distribution decisions. Protection of the patient-physician relationship as a confidential relation would remain unaffected since prioritisation is not the same thing as rationing.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Prioritisation in health care: what does it mean?].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(5):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.022. Epub 2010 Jun 20.
2
[Rationalisation, prioritisation and rationing: approaches to future health care delivery].[合理化、优先排序与配给:未来医疗服务提供的方法]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(5):355-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Aug 7.
3
[Critical reflections on the prioritisation debate: are we setting the right priorities to address our prioritisation challenges?].对优先事项辩论的批判性反思:我们是否在设定正确的优先事项以应对优先事项方面的挑战?
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
4
How fair is cataract prioritisation?白内障优先排序的公平性如何?
N Z Med J. 1998 Oct 23;111(1076):405-7.
5
[What kind of debate on prioritisation do we need for the benefit of our health system and society?].为了我们的医疗系统和社会的利益,我们需要进行什么样的关于优先事项的辩论?
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):383-5. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
6
Ethically acceptable prioritisation of childless couples and treatment rationing: "accountability for reasonableness".无子女夫妇在伦理上可接受的优先排序与治疗配给:“合理性问责”
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Aug;139(2):176-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.02.018. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
7
[Prioritisation in the German health care system--an issue in ophthalmology?].
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2009 Mar;226(3):154-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109173. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
8
[Relationship between prioritisation and rationing--two models].[优先级设定与资源分配的关系——两种模式]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2009;103(2):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2009.02.017.
9
[Rationalization, rationing, prioritization: terminology and ethical approaches to the allocation of limited resources in hematology/oncology].[合理化、配给、优先排序:血液学/肿瘤学中有限资源分配的术语和伦理方法]
Onkologie. 2011;34 Suppl 1:2-5. doi: 10.1159/000323063. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
10
Monitoring prioritisation in the public health-care sector by use of medical guidelines. The case of Norway.利用医疗指南监测公共医疗保健部门的优先事项。以挪威为例。
Health Econ. 2011 Aug;20(8):958-70. doi: 10.1002/hec.1659. Epub 2010 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Ending preventable maternal deaths in Malawi: the stakeholders consensus approach to identify maternal health needs priorities.在马拉维终结可预防的孕产妇死亡:通过利益相关者共识方法确定孕产妇健康需求的优先事项。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 10;25(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12468-4.