Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2010 Oct;6(4):761-73. doi: 10.1002/ieam.75.
A toxicity profile is a toxicological "fingerprint" of an environmental sample, obtained by testing its extract in a battery of bioassays. Each represents a different mode of action. The present work explores the applicability of in vitro toxicity profiles as an effect-based tool for sediment quality assessment. For this purpose, a previously published dataset was used, in which sediment extracts from 15 different locations in the Rhine-Meuse estuary were tested in 5 different bioassays. Three useful approaches could be distinguished for applying toxicity profiles in sediment quality assessment. In the first approach, toxicity profiles are translated into hazard profiles, indicating the relative distance to the desired or acceptable sediment quality status for each toxic mode of action. Hazard profiles can be considered as location-specific characteristics; sampling locations with similar hazard profiles can be classified into clusters. This approach seems directly applicable but requires a very careful selection of a reference toxicity profile that is either measured at a reference location or is designated as a desirable or acceptable toxicity profile for that particular location. In the second approach, toxicity profiles are translated into ecological risk profiles indicating for each toxic mode of action the ratio between the actual measured bioassay response and the bioassay response level that is considered safe for environmental health. This approach has a high ecological relevance but is only feasible for a few modes of action for which toxicity data are available at the ecological level of population or higher that allow derivation of ecologically safe bioassay responses for sediment extracts. In the third approach, toxicity profiles and their derived hazard profiles are used to select samples with unusually or unexpectedly high bioassay responses for further in-depth effect-directed analysis (EDA). EDA is a powerful strategy to identify emerging compounds that contribute significantly to the toxic load on the environment. EDA is an expensive and laborious strategy, however, making it currently suitable only for investigative monitoring on a limited scale and not for routine monitoring. Future perspectives in toxicity profiling include expansion of the battery of bioassays with test methods that cover other toxic endpoints or multiple endpoints, are high throughput, and improve the ecological relevance.
毒性特征图谱是环境样本的毒理学“指纹”,通过在一系列生物测定中测试其提取物获得。每个图谱代表不同的作用模式。本研究探讨了将体外毒性特征图谱作为一种基于效应的沉积物质量评估工具的适用性。为此,使用了先前发表的数据集中的沉积物提取物,该数据集来自莱茵河-默兹河口的 15 个不同地点,在 5 种不同的生物测定中进行了测试。可以区分出三种有用的方法来将毒性特征图谱应用于沉积物质量评估。在第一种方法中,毒性特征图谱被转化为危害特征图谱,指示每种毒性作用模式与所需或可接受的沉积物质量状态的相对距离。危害特征图谱可以被视为特定位置的特征;具有相似危害特征图谱的采样点可以分类为聚类。这种方法似乎直接适用,但需要非常小心地选择参考毒性特征图谱,该图谱要么在参考位置测量,要么被指定为该特定位置的理想或可接受的毒性特征图谱。在第二种方法中,毒性特征图谱被转化为生态风险特征图谱,指示每种毒性作用模式下实际测量的生物测定响应与被认为对环境健康安全的生物测定响应水平之间的比值。这种方法具有很高的生态相关性,但仅适用于少数作用模式,对于这些作用模式,在种群或更高的生态水平上具有毒性数据,允许为沉积物提取物推导生态安全的生物测定响应。在第三种方法中,毒性特征图谱及其衍生的危害特征图谱用于选择具有异常或意外高生物测定响应的样品进行进一步的深入效应定向分析(EDA)。EDA 是一种识别对环境毒性负荷有重大贡献的新兴化合物的有力策略。然而,EDA 是一种昂贵且费力的策略,因此目前仅适用于有限规模的调查性监测,而不适用于常规监测。毒性特征图谱的未来展望包括扩展生物测定试剂盒,增加涵盖其他毒性终点或多个终点、高通量且提高生态相关性的测试方法。