Christiansen Cory L, Stevens-Lapsley Jennifer E
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, 80045, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Oct;91(10):1524-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.009.
To compare weight-bearing asymmetry (WBA) for people with unilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA) with that for healthy adults of similar age. In addition, associations between WBA and clinical measures of knee impairment and functional mobility were evaluated.
Cross-sectional design with age-matched control (CTL) group.
Clinical research laboratory.
People with end-stage unilateral knee OA (n=50) (OA group) and healthy people (n=17) (CTL group) were enrolled in the study (N=67).
Not applicable.
WBA during a Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) based on average vertical ground reaction force under each foot, self-reported knee pain assessed using a Numerical Pain Rating Scale, knee extensor strength asymmetry based on peak isometric knee extension torque, knee motion asymmetry based on maximum passive knee extension and flexion angles, FTSST time, six-minute walk test distance, and Stair Climbing Test time.
The OA group demonstrated greater WBA than the CTL group during transitions between sitting and standing as measured by an absolute symmetry index (P=.015). No correlation was found between WBA and knee motion asymmetry, but comparisons of WBA with all the other outcome variables indicated fair relationships (range, r=.29-.44).
Weight-bearing asymmetry during transitions between sitting and standing can serve as a clinically relevant measure related to both knee impairment and functional mobility for people with unilateral knee OA.
比较单侧膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者与年龄相仿的健康成年人的负重不对称性(WBA)。此外,还评估了WBA与膝关节损伤临床指标及功能活动能力之间的关联。
采用年龄匹配对照组(CTL组)的横断面设计。
临床研究实验室。
纳入终末期单侧膝关节OA患者(n = 50)(OA组)和健康人(n = 17)(CTL组)进行研究(N = 67)。
不适用。
基于每只脚下平均垂直地面反作用力的五次坐立试验(FTSST)期间的WBA、使用数字疼痛评分量表评估的自我报告膝关节疼痛、基于等长膝关节伸展峰值扭矩的膝关节伸肌力量不对称性、基于最大被动膝关节伸展和屈曲角度的膝关节运动不对称性、FTSST时间、六分钟步行试验距离和爬楼梯试验时间。
通过绝对对称指数测量,OA组在坐立转换期间的WBA大于CTL组(P = 0.015)。未发现WBA与膝关节运动不对称性之间存在相关性,但WBA与所有其他结局变量的比较显示出中等程度的相关性(范围,r = 0.29 - 0.44)。
坐立转换期间的负重不对称性可作为单侧膝关节OA患者膝关节损伤和功能活动能力的临床相关指标。