Phillips Flip, Todd James T
Psychology and Neuroscience, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.
J Vis. 2010 Jun 1;10(6):6. doi: 10.1167/10.6.6.
Three experiments are reported that examined the abilities of human observers to discriminate textures with identical distributions of orientation and spatial frequency. In Experiment 1, the stimuli consisted of low-pass filtered noise that was uniformly distributed and spatially isotropic. Observers were able to discriminate textures with identical image statistics when their frequencies were 1 cpd or less, but performance dropped off sharply for textures with higher frequencies. In Experiment 2, a novel procedure was employed with which it is possible to increase the high-frequency energy in the amplitude spectrum of a texture, while preserving the macroscopic alignments of its phase spectrum. The results reveal that this has little effect on performance, thus indicating that it is not spatial frequency per se that limits the abilities of observers to discriminate macroscopic texture patterns. When the phase spectra of these textures were randomly scrambled in Experiment 3, the frequency thresholds for discriminating textures reverted back to 1 cpd as was obtained in Experiment 1. These results provide strong evidence that human observers make use of two distinct procedures for discriminating patches of texture: One based on image statistics that is possible for all textures; and another based on macroscopic phase alignments that define features that are larger than 1°.
本文报告了三项实验,这些实验研究了人类观察者辨别具有相同方向和空间频率分布的纹理的能力。在实验1中,刺激由均匀分布且空间各向同性的低通滤波噪声组成。当频率为1周/度或更低时,观察者能够辨别具有相同图像统计特征的纹理,但对于频率更高的纹理,表现急剧下降。在实验2中,采用了一种新颖的程序,通过该程序可以增加纹理幅度谱中的高频能量,同时保留其相位谱的宏观对齐。结果表明,这对表现几乎没有影响,因此表明限制观察者辨别宏观纹理图案能力的并非空间频率本身。在实验3中,当这些纹理的相位谱被随机打乱时,辨别纹理的频率阈值恢复到实验1中获得的1周/度。这些结果提供了强有力的证据,表明人类观察者利用两种不同的程序来辨别纹理斑块:一种基于所有纹理都可能的图像统计;另一种基于定义大于1°特征的宏观相位对齐。