Department of Psychiatry, Mental Health Institute Oost-Brabant, Veghel, The Netherlands.
Community Ment Health J. 2011 Aug;47(4):463-71. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9348-7. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
During outreaching crisis visits, crisis team members run the risk of being confronted with aggressive behavior from their patients. To prevent dangerous situations, a method to assess risks in advance, on the basis of information received before the visit to the patient in crisis, could prove useful. During a two-year period, crisis team members completed a checklist before visiting patients in psychiatric crises. After each crisis visit, if there had been any aggression, this was recorded by means of the SOAS-R. In 51 of 499 crisis visits (10%) aggression was documented. The results indicate that the predictive validity of the presented checklist for occurrences of aggression may be fair-to-good. Use of the checklist in everyday crisis team practice seems recommendable as it structures the way risks are assessed before entering a potentially dangerous situation.
在上门危机干预访问中,危机干预小组成员可能会面临患者的攻击性行为。为了防止危险情况发生,一种在对处于危机中的患者进行家访之前,根据事先收到的信息来提前评估风险的方法可能会很有用。在两年的时间里,危机干预小组成员在对精神科危机患者进行家访之前完成了一份清单。在每次危机干预访问后,如果发生了任何攻击性行为,都会通过 SOAS-R 进行记录。在 499 次危机干预访问中的 51 次(10%)中记录到了攻击行为。结果表明,所呈现的清单对攻击行为发生的预测有效性可能是中等偏上的。在日常的危机干预小组实践中使用该清单是值得推荐的,因为它在进入潜在危险情况之前构建了评估风险的方式。