Suppr超能文献

社区实践中血运重建后的心脏应激试验模式。

Patterns of cardiac stress testing after revascularization in community practice.

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Oct 12;56(16):1328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.093.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the pattern of cardiac stress testing after coronary revascularization in community practice.

BACKGROUND

The American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria provide guidance for the use of cardiac stress imaging after coronary revascularization. However, little is known regarding the use of routine cardiac stress testing in coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention patients as well as their downstream use of invasive procedures after noninvasive testing in community practice.

METHODS

Use and timing of stress testing more than 90 days after revascularization in patients 18 to 64 years of age were determined from a national health insurance claims database from July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2007. Subsequent rates of angiography and repeat revascularization after stress testing also were examined.

RESULTS

Of 28,177 patients undergoing revascularization (21,046 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and 7,131 coronary artery bypass grafting procedures), 59% had at least 1 cardiac stress test within 24 months. Sixty-one percent of patients with percutaneous coronary intervention and 51% of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting had undergone testing by 24 months. Nuclear imaging was the predominant testing method. The incidence of testing was found to increase at both 6 months and 12 months after revascularization, suggesting an association with elective follow-up office visits. Furthermore, testing varied according to geographic location. Of those tested, only 11% underwent subsequent cardiac catheterization and only 5% underwent repeat revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is limited consensus as to the appropriate role of elective stress testing after coronary revascularization, more than one half of all patients in community practice had at least 1 stress test within 24 months of revascularization. Yield on such testing was low: only 5% of patients tested ultimately required repeat revascularization. These findings support the need to define better the role of stress testing after recent revascularization.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定社区实践中冠状动脉血运重建后心脏应激测试的模式。

背景

美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF)的适当使用标准为冠状动脉血运重建后心脏应激成像的使用提供了指导。然而,对于社区实践中冠状动脉旁路移植术或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者常规心脏应激测试的使用情况及其在非侵入性测试后的下游侵入性程序的使用情况知之甚少。

方法

从 2004 年 7 月 1 日至 2007 年 6 月 30 日的国家健康保险索赔数据库中确定了 18 至 64 岁患者在血运重建后 90 天以上进行应激测试的使用情况和时间。还检查了应激测试后的血管造影和再次血运重建的后续比率。

结果

在接受血运重建的 28177 例患者(21046 例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和 7131 例冠状动脉旁路移植术)中,59%的患者在 24 个月内至少进行了 1 次心脏应激测试。61%的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者和 51%的冠状动脉旁路移植术患者在 24 个月内进行了检查。核成像仍是主要的检查方法。在血运重建后 6 个月和 12 个月时,发现检查的发生率增加,这表明与选择性随访门诊就诊有关。此外,测试结果还因地理位置而异。在接受测试的患者中,只有 11%的患者随后进行了心脏导管插入术,只有 5%的患者进行了再次血运重建。

结论

尽管对于冠状动脉血运重建后选择性应激测试的适当作用存在有限的共识,但在社区实践中,超过一半的患者在血运重建后 24 个月内至少进行了 1 次应激测试。这种测试的效果很低:只有 5%的测试患者最终需要再次血运重建。这些发现支持需要更好地定义最近血运重建后应激测试的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验