Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jun 1;80(2):590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.026. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
The objectives of this study were to quantify residual interfraction displacement of seminal vesicles (SV) and investigate the efficacy of rotation correction on SV displacement in marker-based prostate image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). We also determined the effect of marker registration on the measured SV displacement and its impact on margin design.
SV displacement was determined relative to marker registration by using 296 cone beam computed tomography scans of 13 prostate cancer patients with implanted markers. SV were individually registered in the transverse plane, based on gray-value information. The target registration error (TRE) for the SV due to marker registration inaccuracies was estimated. Correlations between prostate gland rotations and SV displacement and between individual SV displacements were determined.
The SV registration success rate was 99%. Displacement amounts of both SVs were comparable. Systematic and random residual SV displacements were 1.6 mm and 2.0 mm in the left-right direction, respectively, and 2.8 mm and 3.1 mm in the anteroposterior (AP) direction, respectively. Rotation correction did not reduce residual SV displacement. Prostate gland rotation around the left-right axis correlated with SV AP displacement (R(2) = 42%); a correlation existed between both SVs for AP displacement (R(2) = 62%); considerable correlation existed between random errors of SV displacement and TRE (R(2) = 34%).
Considerable residual SV displacement exists in marker-based IGRT. Rotation correction barely reduced SV displacement, rather, a larger SV displacement was shown relative to the prostate gland that was not captured by the marker position. Marker registration error partly explains SV displacement when correcting for rotations. Correcting for rotations, therefore, is not advisable when SV are part of the target volume. Margin design for SVs should take these uncertainties into account.
本研究旨在量化精液囊(SV)的分次间残余移位,并探讨基于标记的前列腺图像引导放疗(IGRT)中旋转校正对 SV 移位的效果。我们还确定了标记配准对测量的 SV 位移的影响及其对边缘设计的影响。
通过对 13 例植入标记物的前列腺癌患者的 296 次锥形束 CT 扫描,使用 296 次锥形束 CT 扫描,基于灰度值信息,对 SV 进行了个体在横断面上的配准。估计了由于标记配准不准确导致 SV 目标配准误差(TRE)。确定了前列腺旋转与 SV 位移之间以及个体 SV 位移之间的相关性。
SV 配准成功率为 99%。两个 SV 的位移量相当。左右方向的系统和随机残余 SV 位移分别为 1.6mm 和 2.0mm,前-后(AP)方向分别为 2.8mm 和 3.1mm。旋转校正并未减少 SV 残余位移。围绕左右轴的前列腺旋转与 SV AP 位移相关(R2=42%);AP 方向上两个 SV 之间存在相关性(R2=62%);SV 位移的随机误差与 TRE 之间存在相当大的相关性(R2=34%)。
基于标记的 IGRT 中存在大量残余 SV 位移。旋转校正几乎没有减少 SV 位移,而是相对于标记位置未捕获的前列腺显示出更大的 SV 位移。当校正旋转时,标记配准误差部分解释了 SV 位移。因此,当 SV 是靶区的一部分时,不建议对旋转进行校正。SV 的边缘设计应考虑到这些不确定性。