Suppr超能文献

医疗保险如何利用比较疗效研究来决定新的覆盖范围和报销。

How Medicare could use comparative effectiveness research in deciding on new coverage and reimbursement.

机构信息

Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, Boston, Massachusetts,

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1796-804. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0623.

Abstract

Medicare must find new ways to achieve cost control without limiting access to beneficial services. We propose a payment model incorporating comparative effectiveness research to encourage Medicare to pay equally for services that provide comparable patient outcomes. The model would include higher payments for services demonstrated by adequate evidence to provide superior health benefits compared to alternative options. New services without such evidence would receive usual reimbursement rates for a limited time but then be reevaluated as evidence emerged. In spite of the substantial political hurdles to changing Medicare reimbursement, efforts should be made to use comparative effectiveness research to reward superior services, improve incentives for cost-effective innovation, and place Medicare on a more sustainable financial footing.

摘要

医疗保险必须找到新的方法来控制成本,而不限制获得有益服务的机会。我们提出了一种支付模式,纳入了比较效果研究,以鼓励医疗保险平等支付那些提供可比患者结果的服务。该模式将为提供优于替代方案的健康效益的服务支付更高的费用。对于没有此类证据的新服务,在有限的时间内将按通常的报销率支付,但随着证据的出现,将重新进行评估。尽管改变医疗保险报销制度存在重大的政治障碍,但应努力利用比较效果研究来奖励优质服务,激励更具成本效益的创新,并使医疗保险更具可持续的财务基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验