Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Regensburg University Medical Center, Franz-Josef-Strauss Allee 11, 93042 Regensburg, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Dec;15(6):1007-12. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0469-8. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
Chipping of the applied veneering ceramic is reported to be a main clinical failure type of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing- or manually copy-milled zirconia restorations. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate whether different substructure designs and veneering processes done by different dental technicians do significantly influence chipping in zirconia-based all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses during simulated oral service. Five groups (n = 8 per group) of three-unit zirconia substructures were fabricated in three different laboratories using copy-milling technique. Three series were veneered with identical porcelain (groups 1-3) and one with a second different porcelain (group 4). The fifth group was milled to final contour design without veneering. Dimensions of the connector areas were determined. All fixed partial dentures (FPDs) were adhesively boned on human teeth and thermally cycled and mechanically loaded (1.2 × 10(6) × 50 N; 6,000 × 5°C/55°C) using human antagonists. Restorations were monitored during thermal cycling and mechanical loading (TCML). FPDs which survived were loaded to fracture. FPDs which failed during TCML were investigated with fractographic means. During TCML, chipping took place in groups 1 (two times), 2 (four times) and 3 (five times) (Table 1). Chipping areas varied between 2.3 mm(2) (group 3) and 58.7 mm(2) (group 2). Groups 4 and 5 provided no failures during TCML. Failure in all cases started from contact points, where superficial wear and disruption of the porcelain were found. No significant correlation could be determined between connector thickness and number of failures. Median fracture results varied between 1,011 N (group 3) and 2,126 N (group 2). The results show the necessity of considering individual design and manufacturing of restorations as well as contact situation. Advanced technical training on zirconia-based restorations is recommended.
应用贴面陶瓷的碎裂被报道为计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造或手动复制铣削氧化锆修复体的主要临床失败类型。本体外研究的目的是调查不同的底层设计和不同的牙科技术人员进行的贴面工艺是否会显著影响模拟口腔服务中氧化锆全瓷固定义齿修复体的碎裂。五组(每组 8 个)三单位氧化锆底层结构在三个不同的实验室中使用复制铣削技术制造。三个系列用相同的瓷贴面(第 1-3 组),一个用不同的第二种瓷贴面(第 4 组)。第五组被铣削到最终的轮廓设计,没有贴面。连接区域的尺寸被确定。所有的固定局部义齿(FPD)都用粘结剂粘接到人牙上,并使用人工拮抗剂进行热循环和机械加载(1.2×10(6)×50 N;6000×5°C/55°C)。在热循环和机械加载(TCML)过程中监测修复体。在 TCML 过程中发生碎裂的 FPD 有 2 次(第 1 组)、4 次(第 2 组)和 5 次(第 3 组)(表 1)。碎裂面积在 2.3 mm(2)(第 3 组)和 58.7 mm(2)(第 2 组)之间变化。第 4 组和第 5 组在 TCML 过程中没有失效。所有情况下的失效都是从接触点开始的,在接触点发现了瓷的表面磨损和破坏。连接器厚度和失效次数之间没有确定的相关性。中位数断裂结果在 1011 N(第 3 组)和 2126 N(第 2 组)之间变化。结果表明,有必要考虑修复体的个体设计和制造以及接触情况。建议对氧化锆基修复体进行高级技术培训。