University of Maryland School of Nursing, 655 W. Lombard St., Baltimore, MD 21201 USA.
Heart. 2011 Mar;97(5):371-81. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.184119. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
To compare the long-term effects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and CPR/automatic external defibrillator (AED) training on anxiety and depression of patients who were medically stable after myocardial infarction (MI) and of their spouses/companions.
Longitudinal.
Post-MI patients (N=460) and their spouses/companions from the Home Automatic External Defibrillator Trial.
Depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II scores) and anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory scores).
At study entry, 25% of the patients and 15% of their spouses were depressed and 21% of the patients and 19% of the spouses were anxious. The prevalence of depression and anxiety did not change over time in the patients or their spouses. Average depression and anxiety decreased for patients but not for spouses. An intervention group did not contribute significantly to these changes. Psychological distress, indicated by depression or anxiety of the spouse or the patient, occurred in 191 couples. Among psychologically distressed patients (N=128), depression and anxiety decreased over time; the intervention group did not contribute to these changes. The reduction in anxiety among male patients was greater than in female patients (p=0.012, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.018). Among psychologically distressed spouses (N=118), depression decreased over time independently of the intervention. Changes in spouse anxiety depended on the intervention group (p=0.012, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.012); anxiety decreased significantly in the CPR and remained high in the CPR/AED group.
There was no evidence that home AEDs caused psychological distress among patients. Even among those who were psychologically distressed when they were assigned to receive either CPR training or CPR/AEDs, home AEDs did not influence changes in patients' depression or anxiety or spouses' depression in comparison with CPR training. Among psychologically distressed spouses, AEDs may keep anxiety higher than it would be otherwise. Interventions to reduce anxiety of spouses who are psychologically distressed may be indicated when their partners receive an AED.
比较心肺复苏(CPR)培训和 CPR/自动体外除颤器(AED)培训对心肌梗死后病情稳定的患者及其配偶/伴侣的焦虑和抑郁的长期影响。
纵向研究。
来自家庭自动体外除颤器试验的心肌梗死(MI)后患者(N=460)及其配偶/伴侣。
抑郁(贝克抑郁量表 II 评分)和焦虑(状态特质焦虑量表评分)。
在研究开始时,25%的患者和 15%的配偶抑郁,21%的患者和 19%的配偶焦虑。患者及其配偶的抑郁和焦虑发生率在随访期间没有随时间而变化。患者的平均抑郁和焦虑程度有所下降,但配偶的没有。干预组对这些变化没有显著贡献。191 对夫妇中有 1 对或双方的配偶或患者存在心理困扰。在有心理困扰的患者中(N=128),抑郁和焦虑随时间而减轻;干预组对这些变化没有贡献。男性患者的焦虑减轻幅度大于女性患者(p=0.012,95%置信区间 0.002 至 0.018)。在有心理困扰的配偶中(N=118),抑郁随时间而减轻,与干预无关。配偶焦虑的变化取决于干预组(p=0.012,95%置信区间 0.001 至 0.012);CPR 组的焦虑显著下降,CPR/AED 组的焦虑仍较高。
没有证据表明家庭 AED 会导致患者产生心理困扰。即使在那些被分配接受 CPR 培训或 CPR/AED 培训时已经有心理困扰的患者中,与 CPR 培训相比,家庭 AED 也不会影响患者的抑郁或焦虑或配偶的抑郁变化。在有心理困扰的配偶中,AED 可能会使焦虑水平高于其他情况。当他们的伴侣接受 AED 时,可能需要对有心理困扰的配偶进行焦虑干预。