Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Dec;88(6):774-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.233. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
Those who conduct clinical trials "enrich" study populations in a variety of ways in order to identify a population of patients in whom a drug effect, if present, is more likely to be demonstrable. The principal ways to do this are as follows: (i) practical enrichment, i.e., generally seeking to reduce noise (variability of measurement) and heterogeneity (by avoiding the enrollment of patients with other diseases and individuals in whom the disease disappears spontaneously), (ii) prognostic enrichment, i.e., finding patients who are likely to have the event of interest when enrolling for risk-reduction studies, and (iii) predictive enrichment, i.e., finding the individuals who are more likely to respond. Enrichment fits well into the growing interest in "individualization" of therapy but creates some tension with another trend, namely, the desire for "real-world studies" with less restrictive entry criteria and other requirements.
那些进行临床试验的人会通过各种方式“丰富”研究人群,以便确定一种药物效应更容易被证明的患者群体。主要方法如下:(i)实际富集,即通常试图减少噪声(测量的可变性)和异质性(通过避免招募患有其他疾病的患者和那些疾病自然消失的个体),(ii)预后富集,即找到在进行风险降低研究时可能发生感兴趣事件的患者,以及(iii)预测富集,即找到更有可能有反应的个体。富集很好地适应了治疗个体化的日益增长的兴趣,但与另一种趋势产生了一些紧张关系,即希望进行限制较少的入组标准和其他要求的“真实世界研究”。