Suppr超能文献

牙医的听力与高速涡轮牙科钻机噪音暴露

Dentists' hearing and exposure to high speed turbine dental drill noise.

作者信息

Lehto T

机构信息

Rehabilitation Research Centre, Social Insurance Institution, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1990;86(3-4):115-25.

PMID:2094844
Abstract

Effect of high speed turbine dental drill noise (DDN) on dentists' hearing at present and during the era of noisier drills was investigated. Hearing of two generations of dentists, power spectral density (PSD) functions of DDN from various drills and the equivalent level (LAeq) of a modern dental operatory were studied. The LAeq was 65 dB with 1 and 50% probability distribution levels of 74 and 57 dB, respectively. DDN was tonal with the spectrum peak always above 6 kHz, containing within 128 Hz frequency band 28-85% of the total noise energy in the PSD function. A cartridge type ball bearing drill from early 1960's was found noisier than an air bearing drill or a modern sealed head ball bearing drill by 8.5 and 5 dB, respectively. Sound pressure levels of DDN ranged from 68 to 79 dBA, being within safe limits. The high values earlier reported for cartridge type or worn drills could not be verified. Hearing of dentists free from clear ear pathology was found good and very similar to the reference, representing a population with no exposure to noise. There was no difference in hearing of 46 dentists 33-42 years of age, examined in 1973 and among whom there had been exposure to early and noisier drill, as compared to hearing of 56 dentists of similar age and years in dentistry, examined in 1988 and who had only been exposed to quieter drills of the 1970's. Noise dose and audiometric measurements were in agreement and indicated that DDN is not and has never been a risk to dentists' hearing.

摘要

研究了高速涡轮牙钻噪声(DDN)目前以及在牙钻噪声更大的时代对牙医听力的影响。研究了两代牙医的听力、各种牙钻的DDN功率谱密度(PSD)函数以及现代牙科诊疗室的等效声级(LAeq)。LAeq为65分贝,1%和50%概率分布水平分别为74分贝和57分贝。DDN为音调性噪声,频谱峰值始终高于6千赫,在128赫兹频段内,PSD函数中总噪声能量的28% - 85%。发现20世纪60年代早期的筒夹式滚珠轴承牙钻比空气轴承牙钻或现代密封头滚珠轴承牙钻分别高8.5分贝和5分贝。DDN的声压级范围为68至79分贝,处于安全限值内。先前报道的筒夹式或磨损牙钻的高值无法得到证实。未发现有明显耳部病变的牙医听力良好,且与对照组非常相似,代表未接触噪声的人群。1973年检查的46名年龄在33 - 42岁之间、曾接触早期噪声较大牙钻的牙医的听力,与1988年检查的56名年龄和牙科从业年限相似、仅接触过20世纪70年代较安静牙钻的牙医的听力相比,没有差异。噪声剂量和听力测定结果一致,表明DDN目前不是且从未对牙医听力构成风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验