Ceylan Ozgür, Bayata Serdar, Yeşil Murat, Arıkan Erdinç, Postacı Nursen
Atatürk Eğitim Hastanesi, 1. Kardiyoloji Kliniği, İzmir, Türkiye.
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2010 Dec;10(6):495-501. doi: 10.5152/akd.2010.160. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
This prospective observational study investigated predictive power of interatrial conduction time (IACT) and P wave dispersion (PWD), in addition to other atrial fibrillation (AF) predictors, in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).
Eighty-one patients undergoing CABG were enrolled. Before surgery, IACT and PWD were measured. Time interval from electrocardiographic P wave to echocardiographic transmitral a wave was defined as IACT. Rhythm monitorization was used for AF detection. Continuous and categorical data were compared with independent samples t test and Chi-square statistics. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent AF predictors.
During a follow-up period of 6.4 ± 2.1 days, AF developed in 14 patients (17%). There were no significant differences between patients with or without AF according to age, gender, number of bypass grafts, cross-clamp duration, systolic function, and left atrial diameter. Significantly increased PWD and IACT were found in AF group (PWD: 37 ± 9 ms vs 24 ± 8 ms, p=0.005 and IACT: 129 ± 11 ms vs 117 ± 11 ms, p=0.01) as compared to group without AF. Increased PWD (OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04-1.31; p=0.02), absence of beta-blocker treatment (OR 8.88; 95% CI 1.62-48.45; p=0.01), diabetes (DM) and hypertension (HT) combination (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.15-4.22; p=0.01) were independent AF predictors. However, IACT predictive power had borderline significance (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.95-1.12; p=0.06).
Increased PWD, absence of beta-blocker therapy, HT-DM combination were independent AF predictors following CABG. There was significant difference between groups according to IACT, however predictive value of IACT was nonsignificant. Other studies are needed to establish predictive power of IACT.
这项前瞻性观察性研究调查了在接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者中,除其他房颤(AF)预测因素外,心房传导时间(IACT)和P波离散度(PWD)的预测能力。
纳入81例接受CABG的患者。术前测量IACT和PWD。心电图P波至超声心动图二尖瓣a波的时间间隔定义为IACT。采用心律监测来检测房颤。连续数据和分类数据分别采用独立样本t检验和卡方统计进行比较。采用多因素logistic回归分析来确定独立的房颤预测因素。
在6.4±2.1天的随访期内,14例患者(17%)发生房颤。根据年龄、性别、旁路移植数量、主动脉阻断时间、收缩功能和左心房直径,房颤患者与非房颤患者之间无显著差异。与非房颤组相比,房颤组的PWD和IACT显著增加(PWD:37±9毫秒对24±8毫秒,p=0.005;IACT:129±11毫秒对117±11毫秒,p=0.01)。PWD增加(OR 1.17;95%CI 1.04-1.31;p=0.02)、未接受β受体阻滞剂治疗(OR 8.88;95%CI 1.62-48.45;p=0.01)、糖尿病(DM)和高血压(HT)合并存在(OR 1.45;95%CI 1.15-4.22;p=0.01)是独立的心颤预测因素。然而,IACT的预测能力具有临界显著性(OR 1.03;95%CI 0.95-1.12;p=0.06)。
PWD增加、未接受β受体阻滞剂治疗、HT-DM合并存在是CABG术后独立的房颤预测因素。两组间IACT存在显著差异,然而IACT的预测价值不显著。需要其他研究来确定IACT的预测能力。