Does pre-biopsy contrast enema delay the diagnosis of long segment Hirschsprung's disease?

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of long segment Hirschsprung's disease (LSHD) is frequently delayed. Our purpose was to: 1) summarize contrast enema (CE) findings in patients with LSHD, and 2) evaluate the utility of CE by comparing LSHD patients managed with/without pre-biopsy CE.

METHODS

All LSHD cases (transition zone [TZ] proximal to the splenic flexure) treated between 1984 and 2009 were stratified according to whether a pre-biopsy CE was done (Group 1) or not (Group 2). CE were reviewed by a single pediatric radiologist, and the original reports were categorized as "helpful", "inconclusive" or "misleading". Group comparisons included elapsed days from admission to diagnostic rectal biopsy/first operation and initial hospitalization length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

29 patients (16 in Group 1; 13 in Group 2) were identified. CE review revealed TZ in 7/16 (44%); and of these, 6 (86%) underestimated the actual aganglionic segment length. 6/16 (38%) original CE reports were "misleading". Overall, Group 1 patients experienced a significant delay in time to biopsy (p=0.047), first operation (p=0.005), and showed a trend towards prolonged LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-biopsy CE offers little to the diagnosis of LSHD and may contribute to diagnosis/treatment delays. Even if a TZ is recognized in biopsy proven HD, the predicted aganglionic segment length should not guide the operative planning.