Suppr超能文献

主动脉内球囊反搏通过降低冠状动脉阻力来募集搭桥血流储备。

Intra-aortic balloon pumping recruits graft flow reserve by lowering coronary resistances.

机构信息

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Magna Graecia, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2012 Feb 9;154(3):293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.09.058. Epub 2010 Oct 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is used worldwide as an anti-ischemic strategy and to reduce myocardial workload. However, whether IABP augments coronary flow after coronary bypass via a passive increase in diastolic pressure or an active response of the coronary bed remains uncertain.

METHODS

We analyzed transit-time flow measurements and the contemporary changes in coronary resistances obtained during 1:1 IABP and during its cessation in 144 consecutive patients receiving prophylactic IABP before isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (n=340 graft segments).

RESULTS

Normally functioning grafts showed lower coronary resistances, greater percentage decrease in resistance, and greater increases in average maximum diastolic and mean flow during 1:1 IABP compared with IABP cessation (P<.001). Arterial and sequential saphenous vein grafts showed better flowmetry and greater reductions in coronary resistances compared with single venous grafts. Accordingly, graft flow reserve (defined as mean flow during 1:1 IABP/mean flow with IABP off) was recruited (graft flow reserve >1) during 1:1 IABP in all normally functioning grafts, with higher values in single arterial or sequential saphenous vein grafts than in single venous grafts (both P<.001). Coronary resistances were higher in 7 failed grafts versus normal-functioning grafts at baseline; these did not decrease during 1:1 IABP and showed worse transit-time flow results.

CONCLUSIONS

IABP recruits graft flow reserve by lowering coronary resistance in functioning grafts. Arterial and sequential venous grafts showed greater reduction in coronary resistance compared with single saphenous grafts.

摘要

背景

主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)作为一种抗缺血策略和降低心肌工作量,在全球范围内得到应用。然而,IABP 是否通过被动增加舒张压或主动响应冠脉床来增加冠脉血流仍不确定。

方法

我们分析了在 1:1 的 IABP 期间和停止 IABP 期间获得的 144 例连续接受预防性 IABP 的患者(n=340 个冠脉搭桥段)的瞬时血流测量值和同期冠脉阻力变化。

结果

正常功能的搭桥显示较低的冠脉阻力、较大的阻力降低百分比以及在 1:1 的 IABP 期间更大的平均最大舒张期和平均流量增加(P<.001)。与单支静脉搭桥相比,动脉和序贯大隐静脉搭桥显示出更好的血流动力学和更大的冠脉阻力降低。相应地,搭桥流量储备(定义为 1:1 的 IABP 期间的平均流量/停止 IABP 期间的平均流量)在所有正常功能的搭桥中被募集(搭桥流量储备>1),并且在单支动脉或序贯大隐静脉搭桥中比在单支静脉搭桥中更高(均 P<.001)。与正常功能的搭桥相比,7 个失败的搭桥在基线时具有更高的冠脉阻力;在 1:1 的 IABP 期间,这些阻力没有降低,并且显示出更差的瞬时血流结果。

结论

IABP 通过降低正常功能的搭桥中的冠脉阻力来募集搭桥流量储备。动脉和序贯静脉搭桥比单支大隐静脉搭桥显示出更大的冠脉阻力降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验