Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang, China.
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):e153-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
To evaluate the influence of monochrome LCDs with different resolutions on the detection performance of pulmonary nodules.
187 chest DR images were selected from our hospital's picture archiving and communication system (PACS), including 111 normal cases and 76 cases with solitary pulmonary nodules. Those positive images were divided into two groups, A and B, according to the diameter of nodules. Three high-, three mid-, and three low-experienced radiologists interpreted those images with a 2 megapixel (MP), a 3 MP and a 5 MP monochrome LCD independently. Regarding the presence of the nodule, five-point confidence level rating scale was used: definite absence, probable absence, indetermination, probable presence and definite presence. The observers were requested to rank each image on the given display according to the presence of pulmonary nodule. Receiver operation characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to interpret the data.
When detecting the pulmonary nodules of Group A on 2 MP-, 3 MP- and 5 MP-LCD, the areas under ROC curves (AUCs) were 0.641, 0.683 and 0.732 for high-experienced radiologists, 0.633, 0.679 and 0.716 for mid-experienced radiologists, 0.620, 0.652 and 0.719 for low-experienced radiologists, respectively; when detecting the pulmonary nodules of Group B, the AUCs were 0.811, 0.830 and 0.842 for high-experienced radiologists, 0.771, 0.821 and 0.837 for mid-experienced radiologists, 0.759, 0.770 and 0.829 for low-experienced radiologists, respectively. However, there were no significant differences among different reading modalities.
For detecting pulmonary nodules, it is equivalent of observer performance among 2 MP-, 3 MP- and 5 MP-LCD.
评估不同分辨率的单色液晶显示器对肺结节检测性能的影响。
从我院的影像归档和通信系统(PACS)中选择了 187 张胸部 DR 图像,包括 111 例正常病例和 76 例孤立性肺结节病例。这些阳性图像根据结节直径分为两组,A 组和 B 组。三位高、中、低经验的放射科医生分别用 200 万像素(MP)、300 万像素和 500 万像素的单色液晶显示器独立解释这些图像。对于结节的存在,采用五点置信水平评分量表:明确不存在、可能不存在、不确定、可能存在和明确存在。要求观察者根据所给显示器上的图像对每个图像进行排序。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析解释数据。
在检测 A 组肺结节时,高经验放射科医生在 2MP、3MP 和 5MP-LCD 上的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.641、0.683 和 0.732,中经验放射科医生为 0.633、0.679 和 0.716,低经验放射科医生为 0.620、0.652 和 0.719;在检测 B 组肺结节时,高经验放射科医生的 AUC 分别为 0.811、0.830 和 0.842,中经验放射科医生为 0.771、0.821 和 0.837,低经验放射科医生为 0.759、0.770 和 0.829。然而,不同阅读方式之间没有显著差异。
在检测肺结节方面,2MP、3MP 和 5MP-LCD 的观察者性能相当。