• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩关节疾病的异质评估:肩关节功能标准化指数的验证。

Heterogeneous assessment of shoulder disorders: validation of the Standardized Index of Shoulder Function.

机构信息

Département de Médecine Physique & Réhabilitation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2010 Nov;42(10):967-72. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0627.

DOI:10.2340/16501977-0627
PMID:21031295
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although 40 assessment tools are described in the literature, very few of them have been correctly validated. The Standardized Index of Shoulder Function (FI2S) encompasses pain, mobility, strength and function. The aim of this work is to describe the FI2S and to study its construct validity, reliability and responsiveness to change.

PATIENTS

Fifty-nine patients with non-surgical (rotator cuff lesions, frozen shoulders, osteoarthritis) or post-surgical (acromioplasty, repairs of rotator cuff tears, arthroplasty) shoulder disorders were included.

METHODS

The FI2S was compared with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH), with the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and with a visual analogue scale for pain.

RESULTS

Inter-test reliability and inter-rater reliability are excellent, with intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.93 (0.88-0.96) and 0.94 (0.90-0.96), respectively. Under a convergent hypothesis, the Spearman's correlation coefficients with the CMS and DASH score are 0.91 (p < 0.0001) and -0.64 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Correlations between the FI2S and the CMS are excellent for mobility and strength, but moderate for pain and functional capacities. Under a divergent hypothesis, no correlation is observed between the FI2S total score and age. Responsiveness to change is excellent.

CONCLUSION

The FI2S appears to be a proper assessment tool for pain, mobility, strength and function in shoulder disorders, easy to administer and of good metric value.

摘要

目的

尽管文献中描述了 40 种评估工具,但只有很少的工具经过了正确验证。标准化肩部功能指数(FI2S)涵盖了疼痛、活动度、力量和功能。本研究旨在描述 FI2S,并研究其结构有效性、可靠性和对变化的反应能力。

患者

59 例患有非手术(肩袖病变、冻结肩、骨关节炎)或手术后(肩峰成形术、肩袖撕裂修复、关节置换术)肩部疾病的患者。

方法

FI2S 与手臂、肩部和手残疾问卷(DASH)、Constant-Murley 评分(CMS)和疼痛视觉模拟量表进行了比较。

结果

测试间可靠性和评分者间可靠性均极佳,组内相关系数分别为 0.93(0.88-0.96)和 0.94(0.90-0.96)。在收敛假设下,与 CMS 和 DASH 评分的 Spearman 相关系数分别为 0.91(p < 0.0001)和-0.64(p < 0.0001)。FI2S 与 CMS 之间的相关性在移动性和力量方面非常好,但在疼痛和功能能力方面为中度。在发散假设下,FI2S 总分与年龄之间无相关性。变化的反应能力非常好。

结论

FI2S 似乎是肩部疾病疼痛、活动度、力量和功能的一种合适的评估工具,易于管理且具有良好的度量值。

相似文献

1
Heterogeneous assessment of shoulder disorders: validation of the Standardized Index of Shoulder Function.肩关节疾病的异质评估:肩关节功能标准化指数的验证。
J Rehabil Med. 2010 Nov;42(10):967-72. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0627.
2
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in shoulder disorders.法语版《手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾问卷》在肩部疾病中的信度、效度及反应度
Man Ther. 2009 Apr;14(2):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
3
Shoulder-specific disability measures showed acceptable construct validity and responsiveness.肩部特异性残疾测量具有可接受的结构有效性和反应性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;63(2):163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.023. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
4
Validity of the QuickDASH in patients with shoulder-related disorders undergoing surgery.在接受肩部相关疾病手术的患者中,QuickDASH 的有效性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Jan;45(1):25-36. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5033.
5
Which Is the Best Outcome Measure for Rotator Cuff Tears?肩袖撕裂的最佳结局测量指标是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Aug;477(8):1869-1878. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000800.
6
Validation of a German version of the 'Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand' questionnaire (DASH-G).《手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍》问卷德文版(DASH-G)的验证
Z Rheumatol. 2003 Apr;62(2):168-77. doi: 10.1007/s00393-003-0461-7.
7
The development and validation of an appraisal method for rotator cuff disorders: the Korean Shoulder Scoring System.肩袖疾病评估方法的开发与验证:韩国肩部评分系统
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct;18(5):689-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.019. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Oxford shoulder score.韩国版牛津肩部评分的跨文化调适与验证。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Jan;132(1):93-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1393-3. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
9
Magnetic resonance imaging of the rotator interval in patients on long-term hemodialysis: correlation with the range of shoulder motions.长期血液透析患者肩袖间隙的磁共振成像:与肩关节活动范围的相关性
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 Nov-Dec;31(6):970-5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31805930f4.
10
A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder.一份用于评估肩部症状和功能的自填式问卷。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 May;79(5):738-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Shoulder Performance Activity Test (SPAT) for People With Shoulder Pain: Feasibility, Reliability, and Validity.肩部疼痛患者的肩部表现活动测试(SPAT):可行性、可靠性和有效性。
Phys Ther. 2023 Mar 3;103(3). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad006.
2
A Case Series: Effect of Comorbidities on the Outcomes of Prolotherapy Injection for Frozen Shoulder Patients.病例系列:合并症对肩周炎患者注射注射疗法疗效的影响。
Int Med Case Rep J. 2023 Apr 28;16:257-263. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S407723. eCollection 2023.
3
Shoulder assessment by smartphone: a valid alternative for times of social distancing.
智能手机进行肩部评估:社交隔离时期的有效替代方法。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jun;142(6):979-985. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03762-x. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
Physical Therapy Intervention to Augment Outcomes Of Lymph Node Transfer Surgery for a Breast Cancer Survivor with Secondary Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Case Report.物理治疗干预对一名患有继发性上肢淋巴水肿的乳腺癌幸存者淋巴结转移手术结局的改善:一例报告
Int J Stud Scholarsh Phys Ther. 2015;1:30-44.
5
Correlation between functional disability and quality of life in patients with adhesive capsulitis.肩周炎患者功能障碍与生活质量的相关性
Acta Ortop Bras. 2015 Mar-Apr;23(2):81-4. doi: 10.1590/1413-78522015230200791.
6
Randomized controlled trial for efficacy of capsular distension for adhesive capsulitis: fluoroscopy-guided anterior versus ultrasonography-guided posterolateral approach.关节囊扩张术治疗粘连性关节囊炎疗效的随机对照试验:透视引导下前路与超声引导下后外侧入路对比
Ann Rehabil Med. 2014 Jun;38(3):360-8. doi: 10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.360. Epub 2014 Jun 26.