Suppr超能文献

心率和血压对射血分数降低型与射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者结局的影响差异。

Differential impact of heart rate and blood pressure on outcome in patients with heart failure with reduced versus preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

机构信息

Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2012 Mar 8;155(2):249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In contrast to patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; HFREF) the prognostic role of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in patients with HF and preserved LVEF (HFPEF) is not well known. The aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between HR and BP and outcomes in HFPEF and to compare it to HFREF.

METHODS

The association between HR and BP and outcomes (median follow-up: 38 months) was analyzed in patients with HFREF (LVEF ≤ 45%; n=6792) and HFPEF (LVEF > 45%; n=988) from the Digitalis Investigator Group trial.

RESULTS

Mortality (35% vs. 23%) and HF hospitalization rates (31% vs. 20%; p<0.001 for both) were higher in HFREF compared to HFPEF. In HFREF, higher HR and lower systolic and diastolic BP quartiles were associated with higher mortality and HF hospitalization rates. By contrast, there was no significant association between HR and BP respectively and mortality in HFPEF, and there was no significant association between systolic BP and hospitalization risk in HFPEF either. However, HF hospitalization rates were significantly related to increasing HR and decreasing diastolic BP quartile respectively (4.9, 6.8, 6.8, and 10.5 and 5.5, 8.1, 6.0, and 10.1 respectively events per 1000 person-years) in HFPEF. In HFPEF, there was also evidence of a significant J-shaped relationship between pulse pressure and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic value of HR and BP differed substantially between HFREF and HFPEF. These data may provide a foundation for the design of novel interventions in HFPEF patients.

摘要

背景

与左心室射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFREF;HFREF)患者相比,心率(HR)和血压(BP)在射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFPEF;HFPEF)患者中的预后作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在描述 HFPEF 患者 HR 和 BP 与结局的关系,并将其与 HFREF 进行比较。

方法

从 Digitalis Investigator Group 试验中分析 HFREF(LVEF ≤ 45%;n=6792)和 HFPEF(LVEF > 45%;n=988)患者的 HR 和 BP 与结局(中位随访:38 个月)之间的关系。

结果

HFREF 患者的死亡率(35%比 23%;均<0.001)和 HF 住院率(31%比 20%;均<0.001)均高于 HFPEF。在 HFREF 中,较高的 HR 和较低的收缩压和舒张压四分位数与较高的死亡率和 HF 住院率相关。相比之下,在 HFPEF 中,HR 和 BP 分别与死亡率无显著相关性,HFPEF 中收缩压与住院风险也无显著相关性。然而,HFPEF 中 HR 和舒张压四分位数的升高分别与 HF 住院率显著相关(4.9、6.8、6.8 和 10.5 和 5.5、8.1、6.0 和 10.1 分别为每 1000 人年的事件数)。在 HFPEF 中,脉压与死亡率之间也存在显著的 J 形关系。

结论

HR 和 BP 的预后价值在 HFREF 和 HFPEF 之间有很大差异。这些数据可能为 HFPEF 患者的新型干预措施的设计提供基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验