Suppr超能文献

术前颈动脉双功超声检查结果可预测有症状但无症状患者在动脉内膜切除术中的颈动脉残端压力。

Preoperative carotid duplex findings predict carotid stump pressures during endarterectomy in symptomatic but not asymptomatic patients.

作者信息

Chiriano Jason, Abou-Zamzam Ahmed M, Nguyen Kahn, Molkara Afshin M, Zhang Wayne W, Bianchi Christian, Teruya Theodore H

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;24(8):1038-44. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.05.014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid stump pressure (CSP) is frequently measured to determine the need for shunt use during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We hypothesized that the preoperative carotid duplex examination correlates with preoperative symptoms and intraoperative CSP.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CEA over a 7-year period were identified from our vascular registry. CEA was performed with selective shunting on the basis of intraoperative CSP <30 mm Hg regardless of symptoms or contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The preoperative duplex was categorized by ipsilateral and contralateral ICA diameter-reduction stenosis (<15%, 15-45%, 45-70%, 70-99% [severe] and occluded), and the direction of vertebral artery flow. The relationships among preoperative duplex findings, symptom status, and CSP were evaluated using unpaired t-test and Chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 303 CEAs were performed. Stump pressures were documented in 284 patients, which comprised the study population. Asymptomatic severe stenosis was the indication for CEA in 179 cases (59.1%). Symptomatic patients (Sx) had significantly lower stump pressures than asymptomatic (ASx) patients (40.72 ± 16.27 vs. 45.8 ± 17.64 mm Hg, p = 0.0167). Fifty-seven patients (19%) had contralateral severe ICA stenosis or occlusion. Contralateral ICA stenosis or occlusion had significantly lower CSP than those with lesser degrees of stenosis (39.24 ± 15 vs. 44.82 ± 17.62 mm Hg, p = 0.0267). Contralateral ICA severe stenosis or occlusion correlated with lower CSP in Sx patients (32.05 ± 8.24 vs. 42.92 ± 16.95 mm Hg, p = 0.038) but not in ASx patients (43.2 ± 16 vs. 46.29 ± 17.5 mm Hg, p = 0.39). CSP was <30 mm Hg in 63% of Sx patients and 24% of ASx patients (p = 0.012). Overall shunt usage was 84/2,842 (9.5%). Perioperative stroke and death rate was 2.7%. Perioperative stroke did not correlate with the presence of contralateral occlusion, or severity of contralateral stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic patients undergoing CEA have lower stump pressures than ASx patients overall and also in the presence of contralateral disease. The incidence of perioperative stroke was not predicted by severity of contralateral disease. A strategy of selective shunting seems appropriate even in Sx patients with contralateral severe stenosis or occlusion. Although a high-risk cohort for perioperative neurologic events exists and may include those with symptomatic disease and contralateral severe stenosis or occlusion, further study is warranted to define the patients who will clinically benefit from shunt placement.

摘要

背景

颈动脉残端压力(CSP)常用于确定颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)期间是否需要使用分流管。我们假设术前颈动脉双功超声检查与术前症状及术中CSP相关。

方法

从我们的血管登记系统中识别出7年间接受CEA的患者。无论症状或对侧颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄情况如何,根据术中CSP<30mmHg进行选择性分流的CEA手术。术前双功超声根据同侧和对侧ICA直径缩小狭窄程度(<15%、15 - 45%、45 - 70%、70 - 99%[重度]和闭塞)以及椎动脉血流方向进行分类。使用非配对t检验和卡方分析评估术前双功超声检查结果、症状状态和CSP之间的关系。

结果

共进行了303例CEA手术。284例患者记录了残端压力,构成研究人群。179例(59.1%)患者因无症状重度狭窄接受CEA手术。有症状患者(Sx)的残端压力显著低于无症状患者(ASx)(40.72±16.27 vs. 45.8±17.64mmHg,p = 0.0167)。57例患者(19%)存在对侧重度ICA狭窄或闭塞。对侧ICA狭窄或闭塞患者的CSP显著低于狭窄程度较轻的患者(39.24±15 vs. 44.82±17.62mmHg,p = 0.0267)。对侧ICA重度狭窄或闭塞与Sx患者较低的CSP相关(32.05±8.24 vs. 42.92±16.95mmHg,p = 0.038),但与ASx患者无关(43.2±16 vs. 46.29±17.5mmHg,p = 0.39)。63%的Sx患者和24%的ASx患者CSP<30mmHg(p = 0.012)。总体分流使用率为84/2842(9.5%)。围手术期卒中及死亡率为2.7%。围手术期卒中与对侧闭塞的存在或对侧狭窄的严重程度无关。

结论

接受CEA的有症状患者总体残端压力低于ASx患者,在存在对侧疾病时也是如此。围手术期卒中的发生率无法通过对侧疾病的严重程度预测。即使在对侧重度狭窄或闭塞的Sx患者中,选择性分流策略似乎也是合适的。尽管存在围手术期神经事件的高风险队列,可能包括有症状疾病及对侧重度狭窄或闭塞的患者,但仍需进一步研究以确定哪些患者将从分流管放置中获得临床益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验