• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受心脏导管插入术和介入治疗的女性血管并发症的血管造影预测因素。

Angiographic predictors of vascular complications among women undergoing cardiac catheterization and intervention.

作者信息

Ahmed Bina, Lischke Stefan, Holterman Leigh Ann, Straight Faye, Dauerman Harold L

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, McClure 1, University of Vermont Fletcher Allen Health Care, 111 Colchester Avenue, Burlington VT 05401, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Nov;22(11):512-6.

PMID:21041845
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bleeding and vascular complications remain more common in women than men undergoing invasive cardiovascular procedures. We determined the role of femoral angiographic variables in risk-stratifying women for vascular complications.

METHODS

Between 2004-2009, all major bleeding and vascular complications among women undergoing diagnostic or interventional cardiovascular procedures were identified at a single center. Thirty consecutive female patients (major bleeding or vascular complication) were then age- and procedure-matched to 90 controls (no vascular complications). Quantitative femoral angiography was performed on all cases and controls.

RESULTS

Smaller minimum luminal diameter was a strong univariate predictor of vascular complications in women (odds ratio [OR] 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.90; p = 0.009), while site of arteriotomy was not predictive of complications. The prognostic significance of smaller femoral lumen diameter was mildly attenuated after adjusting for the predictive factor of smaller patient body size, even after adjusting for the predictive factor of smaller patient body size. Finally, multivariable modeling suggests that utilization of vascular closure devices (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.96; p = 0.04) may be protective in women.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with smaller femoral arteries are at significantly higher risk for bleeding and vascular complications than women with larger femoral arteries. Risk stratification for bleeding complications among women should account for clinical, pharmacologic and femoral angiographic factors.

摘要

背景

在接受侵入性心血管手术的患者中,女性出血和血管并发症的发生率仍高于男性。我们确定了股动脉血管造影变量在女性血管并发症风险分层中的作用。

方法

2004年至2009年期间,在单一中心识别了接受诊断性或介入性心血管手术的女性患者中所有主要的出血和血管并发症。然后,将连续30例女性患者(主要出血或血管并发症)按年龄和手术情况与90例对照(无血管并发症)进行匹配。对所有病例和对照进行定量股动脉血管造影。

结果

最小管腔直径较小是女性血管并发症的一个强有力的单变量预测因素(优势比[OR]0.65;95%置信区间[CI]0.47-0.90;p=0.009),而动脉切开部位不是并发症的预测因素。即使在调整了患者体型较小这一预测因素后,股动脉管腔直径较小的预后意义仍略有减弱。最后,多变量模型表明,使用血管闭合装置(OR 0.26,95%CI 0.07-0.96;p=0.04)可能对女性有保护作用。

结论

股动脉较小的女性发生出血和血管并发症的风险明显高于股动脉较大的女性。女性出血并发症的风险分层应考虑临床、药理学和股动脉血管造影因素。

相似文献

1
Angiographic predictors of vascular complications among women undergoing cardiac catheterization and intervention.接受心脏导管插入术和介入治疗的女性血管并发症的血管造影预测因素。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Nov;22(11):512-6.
2
Angiographic predictors of femoral access site complications: implication for planned percutaneous coronary intervention.股动脉穿刺部位并发症的血管造影预测因素:对计划性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的意义
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Jun;65(2):196-202. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20354.
3
Femoral artery complications after cardiac catheterization: a study of patient profile.心脏导管插入术后股动脉并发症:患者资料研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;24(3):328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.06.025. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
4
Femoral vascular access complications in adult congenital heart disease patients: audit from a single tertiary center.成人先天性心脏病患者的股血管通路并发症:来自单一三级中心的审计
Congenit Heart Dis. 2008 Sep-Oct;3(5):336-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2008.00204.x.
5
Gender related differences in predictors of vascular complications: role of vessel size and BMI.性别相关的血管并发症预测因素差异:血管大小和 BMI 的作用。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013 Jul;36(1):84-90. doi: 10.1007/s11239-012-0847-y.
6
Trends in vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery, 1998 to 2007.1998年至2007年经股动脉进行诊断性心导管插入术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血管并发症的趋势
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun;1(3):317-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.03.013.
7
Safety and effectiveness of a novel vascular closure device: a prospective study of the ExoSeal compared to the Angio-Seal and ProGlide.一种新型血管闭合装置的安全性和有效性:ExoSeal与Angio-Seal和ProGlide的前瞻性对比研究。
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Dec;21(6):822-8. doi: 10.1583/14-4744MR.1.
8
A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.一项基于注册的随机临床试验比较了女性行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时桡动脉和股动脉入路:SAFE-PCI for Women(女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗入路增强研究)试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):857-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.007.
9
Comparison of access-related bleeding complications in women versus men undergoing percutaneous coronary catheterization using the radial versus femoral artery.经桡动脉与股动脉行冠状动脉介入治疗的女性与男性患者中与血管入路相关的出血并发症比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 1;99(9):1216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.038. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
10
Retroperitoneal hemorrhage from inferior epigastric artery: value of femoral angiography for detection and management.来自腹壁下动脉的腹膜后出血:股动脉血管造影在检测和处理中的价值
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Aug;68(2):267-70. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20835.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-Related Differences in the Pathophysiology, Cardiac Imaging, and Clinical Outcomes of Aortic Stenosis: A Narrative Review.主动脉瓣狭窄病理生理学、心脏成像及临床结局中的性别差异:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 24;13(21):6359. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216359.
2
Sex Differences in Aortic Stenosis: From the Pathophysiology to the Intervention, Current Challenges, and Future Perspectives.主动脉瓣狭窄中的性别差异:从病理生理学到干预措施、当前挑战及未来展望
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 19;13(14):4237. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144237.
3
Sex differences in aortic stenosis: Identification of knowledge gaps for sex-specific personalized medicine.
主动脉瓣狭窄中的性别差异:确定性别特异性个性化医疗的知识空白。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Sep;21. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100197. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
4
Are there sex differences in the effect of type 2 diabetes in the incidence and outcomes of myocardial infarction? A matched-pair analysis using hospital discharge data.2 型糖尿病对心肌梗死发病率和结局的影响是否存在性别差异?利用医院出院数据的配对分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Apr 22;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01273-y.
5
Gender related differences in predictors of vascular complications: role of vessel size and BMI.性别相关的血管并发症预测因素差异:血管大小和 BMI 的作用。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013 Jul;36(1):84-90. doi: 10.1007/s11239-012-0847-y.