• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轮椅技能测试版本 4.1 对手动轮椅使用者的性能和安全性评分的可靠性。

Reliability of the performance and safety scores of the wheelchair skills test version 4.1 for manual wheelchair users.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1752-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.226.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.226
PMID:21044722
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the interrater, intrarater, and test-retest reliability of the total performance and safety scores of the Wheelchair Skills Test version 4.1 (WST 4.1) for manual wheelchairs operated by adult wheelchair users.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

University research setting.

PARTICIPANTS

People (N=11) who used manual wheelchairs for community locomotion.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Participants were videotaped as they completed the WST 4.1 (30 skills) on 2 separate occasions 1 to 2 weeks apart. Subsequently, raters scored the WST 4.1 from the video recordings and each participant received a total score for performance and safety. Using those scores, interrater, intrarater, and test-retest reliability were determined by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Percentages of agreement between raters for individual skills also were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD overall WST 4.1 scores for performance and safety were 80.1%±8.5% and 98.0%±2.8%. ICCs for the interrater, intrarater, and test-retest reliability of the performance component were .855, .950, and .901 (P<.001). Safety component ICC scores were .061 (P=.243), .228 (P=.048), and .254 (P=.041). Percentages of agreement between raters for each test item for both the performance and safety scales ranged from 68% to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Reliability of the performance component of the WST 4.1 was excellent, whereas ICCs for the safety component indicated only slight to fair agreement, probably because of the low variability in safety scores. Additional study is needed to further evaluate the reliability of the safety component with a larger and more diverse sample group.

摘要

目的

评估成人手动轮椅使用者操作的轮椅技能测试第 4.1 版(WST 4.1)的总体表现和安全性评分的评分者间、评分者内和重测信度。

设计

队列研究。

设置

大学研究环境。

参与者

使用手动轮椅进行社区活动的人(N=11)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

参与者在相隔 1 至 2 周的 2 个不同时间点通过录像完成 WST 4.1(30 项技能)。随后,评分者根据录像对 WST 4.1 进行评分,每位参与者获得表现和安全性的总分。使用这些分数,通过组内相关系数(ICC)确定评分者间、评分者内和重测信度。还计算了评分者对个别技能的一致性百分比。

结果

表现和安全性的 WST 4.1 总分平均值±标准差分别为 80.1%±8.5%和 98.0%±2.8%。表现部分的评分者间、评分者内和重测信度的 ICC 分别为.855、.950 和.901(P<.001)。安全部分的 ICC 评分分别为.061(P=.243)、.228(P=.048)和.254(P=.041)。表现和安全性量表的每个测试项目的评分者间一致性百分比范围为 68%至 100%。

结论

WST 4.1 的表现部分的可靠性为优秀,而安全部分的 ICC 表明仅存在轻微至中等的一致性,可能是由于安全评分的变异性较低。需要进一步研究以使用更大、更多样化的样本组进一步评估安全部分的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Reliability of the performance and safety scores of the wheelchair skills test version 4.1 for manual wheelchair users.轮椅技能测试版本 4.1 对手动轮椅使用者的性能和安全性评分的可靠性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1752-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.226.
2
From "wheelchair circuit" to "wheelchair assessment instrument for people with multiple sclerosis": reliability and validity analysis of a test to assess driving skills in manual wheelchair users with multiple sclerosis.从“轮椅回路”到“多发性硬化症患者轮椅评估工具”:评估多发性硬化症手动轮椅使用者驾驶技能的测试的可靠性和有效性分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):1052-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.025. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
3
Interrater and intrarater reliability of the wheelchair skills test version 4.2 for power wheelchair users.电动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能测试版本4.2的评分者间信度和评分者内信度
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Mar;40(6):678-683. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1271464. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
Manual wheelchair skills capacity versus performance.手动轮椅技能能力与表现。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):1009-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.027. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
5
The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure.轮椅技能测试:一项新结局指标的初步研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jan;83(1):10-8. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.26823.
6
Comparing performance of manual wheelchair skills using new and conventional rear anti-tip devices: randomized controlled trial.使用新型和传统后防倾翻装置比较手动轮椅技能表现:随机对照试验
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):480-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.163.
7
Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial.针对社区使用手动轮椅者的轮椅技能培训:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Dec;86(12):2316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.300.
8
Reliability of the seated postural control measure for adult wheelchair users.成人轮椅使用者坐姿姿势控制测量的可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Dec 30;27(24):1479-91. doi: 10.1080/09638280500276570.
9
Effectiveness of a wheelchair skills training programme for community-living users of manual wheelchairs in Turkey: a randomized controlled trial.土耳其一项针对社区居住的手动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能训练计划的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2011 May;25(5):416-24. doi: 10.1177/0269215510386979. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
10
Efficacy and retention of the French-Canadian version of the wheelchair skills training program for manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial.法语版轮椅技能训练计划对手动轮椅使用者的疗效和保留率:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):940-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Manual Wheelchair Skills Training for Improving Skills and Confidence in People With Hereditary Degenerative Disorders: Protocol for a Sequential Multimethods Study.手动轮椅技能训练对提高遗传性退行性疾病患者技能和信心的疗效:一项序贯多方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 31;14:e66974. doi: 10.2196/66974.
2
Incidence and dynamics of mobility device use among community-dwelling older adults in the United States.美国社区居住老年人使用移动设备的发生率及动态变化
J Elder Policy. 2024 Oct;3(2):70-94. doi: 10.1002/jey2.12011. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Influence of sitting posture on anterior buttock sliding during wheelchair propulsion of hemiplegic stroke patients.
偏瘫中风患者轮椅推进过程中坐姿对臀部前滑的影响。
Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci. 2023 Aug 2;14:54-59. doi: 10.11336/jjcrs.14.54. eCollection 2023.
4
Efficacy of Wheelchair Skills Training Program in Enhancing Sitting Balance and Pulmonary Function in Chronic Tetraplegic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.轮椅技能训练计划对改善慢性四肢瘫痪患者坐位平衡和肺功能的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 6;59(9):1610. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091610.
5
Exploring the Influence of a Community-Based Peer-Led Wheelchair Skills Training on Satisfaction with Participation in Children and Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy and Spina Bifida: A Pilot Study.探索社区主导的同伴指导轮椅技能训练对脑瘫和脊柱裂儿童和青少年参与满意度的影响:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;19(19):11908. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911908.
6
Tracking and Characterization of Spinal Cord-Injured Patients by Means of RGB-D Sensors.基于 RGB-D 传感器对脊髓损伤患者的跟踪和特征描述。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 4;20(21):6273. doi: 10.3390/s20216273.
7
Body System Effects of a Multi-Modal Training Program Targeting Chronic, Motor Complete Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury.针对慢性、运动完全性胸段脊髓损伤的多模式训练计划对身体系统的影响。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Feb 1;35(3):411-423. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5105. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
8
Feasibility of the trial procedures for a randomized controlled trial of a community-based peer-led wheelchair training program for older adults.一项针对老年人的社区同伴主导轮椅训练计划的随机对照试验的试验程序可行性。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Jul 17;4:18. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0158-3. eCollection 2018.
9
Development of a wheelchair mobility skills test for children and adolescents: combining evidence with clinical expertise.儿童及青少年轮椅移动技能测试的开发:将证据与临床专业知识相结合。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 13;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0809-9.
10
Effectiveness of a Wheelchair Skills Training Program for Powered Wheelchair Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial.电动轮椅使用者轮椅技能培训项目的有效性:一项随机对照试验
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Nov;96(11):2017-26.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 30.