Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006 Dec 1;23(8):1083-103. doi: 10.1080/02643290600665778.
Recent neuroimaging studies have revealed that letters activate both the left and the right fusiform areas, but that only the left fusiform responds to letters more than to control stimuli (Cohen et al., 2003). Though these findings suggest that the left fusiform is specialized in its function of identifying letters, it does not rule out the possibility that the right fusiform contributes critically to letter identification processes. We used a behavioural word identification task in which we compared bilateral and unilateral displays to determine the cost of engaging the right hemisphere with a distractor stimulus. We found that while engaging the left hemisphere led to a robust interference effect, engaging the right hemisphere had no effect at all. We were able to rule out an attentional bias to the right visual field as a possible explanation of the asymmetrical interference effect. We conclude that while the right hemisphere may be able to assume letter identification processing responsibilities in some patients with brain damage, the right hemisphere does not contribute critically to abstract letter identification processes in healthy right-handed individuals.
最近的神经影像学研究表明,字母既激活左梭状回又激活右梭状回,但只有左梭状回对字母的反应比对控制刺激的反应更强烈(Cohen 等人,2003 年)。尽管这些发现表明左梭状回在识别字母的功能上是专门化的,但不能排除右梭状回对字母识别过程有重要贡献的可能性。我们使用了一种行为词识别任务,在该任务中,我们比较了双侧和单侧显示,以确定用干扰刺激参与右半球的代价。我们发现,虽然参与左半球会导致强烈的干扰效应,但参与右半球则根本没有效果。我们排除了对右视野的注意力偏向作为不对称干扰效应的可能解释。我们的结论是,虽然右半球在某些脑损伤患者中可能能够承担字母识别处理的责任,但在健康右利手个体中,右半球对抽象字母识别过程并没有至关重要的贡献。