Suppr超能文献

环节动物(多足虫)的生长模式:缺乏局部化的后增殖区。

Growth patterns in Onychophora (velvet worms): lack of a localised posterior proliferation zone.

机构信息

Institute of Biology II, Animal Evolution & Development, University of Leipzig, Talstrasse 33, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Nov 4;10:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-339.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During embryonic development of segmented animals, body segments are thought to arise from the so-called "posterior growth zone" and the occurrence of this "zone" has been used to support the homology of segmentation between arthropods, annelids, and vertebrates. However, the term "posterior growth zone" is used ambiguously in the literature, mostly referring to a region of increased proliferation at the posterior end of the embryo. To determine whether such a localised posterior proliferation zone is an ancestral feature of Panarthropoda (Onychophora + Tardigrada + Arthropoda), we examined cell division patterns in embryos of Onychophora.

RESULTS

Using in vivo incorporation of the DNA replication marker BrdU (5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine) and anti-phospho-histone H3 immunolabelling, we found that a localised posterior region of proliferating cells does not occur at any developmental stage in onychophoran embryos. This contrasts with a localised pattern of cell divisions at the posterior end of annelid embryos, which we used as a positive control. Based on our data, we present a mathematical model, which challenges the paradigm that a localised posterior proliferation zone is necessary for segment patterning in short germ developing arthropods.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that a posterior proliferation zone was absent in the last common ancestor of Onychophora and Arthropoda. By comparing our data from Onychophora with those from annelids, arthropods, and chordates, we suggest that the occurrence of a "posterior growth zone" currently cannot be used to support the homology of segmentation between these three animal groups.

摘要

背景

在分节动物的胚胎发育过程中,体节被认为是从所谓的“后部生长区”产生的,而这个“区”的存在被用来支持节肢动物、环节动物和脊椎动物之间的同源性。然而,“后部生长区”一词在文献中使用得非常含糊,主要是指胚胎后端增殖增加的区域。为了确定这样一个局部的后部增殖区是否是泛节肢动物(有爪动物+缓步动物+节肢动物)的祖征,我们检查了有爪动物胚胎的细胞分裂模式。

结果

我们使用 DNA 复制标记 BrdU(5-溴-2'-脱氧尿苷)的体内掺入和抗磷酸组蛋白 H3 免疫标记,发现有爪动物胚胎在任何发育阶段都没有出现局部的增殖细胞区。这与环节动物胚胎后端局部的细胞分裂模式形成对比,我们将其作为阳性对照。基于我们的数据,我们提出了一个数学模型,该模型对局部的后部增殖区对于短体节发育的节肢动物的体节模式形成是必要的这一范式提出了挑战。

结论

我们的发现表明,在有爪动物和节肢动物的最后共同祖先中,不存在后部增殖区。通过将我们来自有爪动物的数据与来自环节动物、节肢动物和脊索动物的数据进行比较,我们认为目前不能将“后部生长区”的出现用于支持这三个动物群体之间的同源性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9100/2984424/b7762ecaa9b5/1471-2148-10-339-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验