Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas 78705, USA.
Heart Rhythm. 2011 Mar;8(3):368-72. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.043. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation can be performed under general anesthesia or conscious sedation at the physician's preference.
We randomized a series of consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation to either general anesthesia or conscious sedation to assess differences in pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection during redo procedures and impact on success rate.
A total of 257 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing AF ablation were enrolled and randomized to either conscious sedation with fentanyl or midazolam (128 patients, group 1) and general anesthesia (129 patients, group 2). In all patients, a high dosage of isoproterenol up to 30 μg/min was used to disclose PV reconnection or extra PV firings.
Baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 groups. At 17 ± 8 month follow-up after the first ablation, 88 (69%) patients in group 1 were free of atrial arrhythmias off all antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD), as compared with 114 (88%) in group 2 (log-rank P <.001). All patients with recurrence had a second procedure. At the repeat procedure, 42% (66 of 158) of PVs in group 1 had recovered PV conduction, compared with 19% (11 of 57) in group 2 (P = .003). Compared with group 1, group 2 had a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (53 ± 9 min vs. 84 ± 21 min, P <.001) and procedure time (2.4 ± 1.4 h vs. 3.6 ± 1.1 h, P <.001).
The use of general anesthesia is associated with higher cure rate with a single procedure, and it seems to reduce the prevalence of PV reconnection observed at the time of repeat ablation.
心房颤动的射频导管消融可以在医生的偏好下在全身麻醉或清醒镇静下进行。
我们将一系列连续的阵发性心房颤动(AF)接受射频导管消融的患者随机分为全身麻醉或清醒镇静组,以评估 redo 手术中肺静脉(PV)再连接的差异及其对成功率的影响。
共纳入 257 例阵发性 AF 行 AF 消融的连续患者,并随机分为芬太尼或咪达唑仑清醒镇静组(128 例,组 1)和全身麻醉组(129 例,组 2)。在所有患者中,使用高剂量异丙肾上腺素(高达 30μg/min)来揭示 PV 再连接或额外的 PV 点火。
两组患者的基线临床特征无显著差异。在第一次消融后 17±8 个月的随访中,组 1 中有 88(69%)例患者停用所有抗心律失常药物(AAD)后无房性心律失常,而组 2 中有 114(88%)例患者(对数秩 P<.001)。所有复发的患者均进行了第二次手术。在重复手术中,组 1 中有 42%(66/158)的 PV 恢复了 PV 传导,而组 2 中仅有 19%(11/57)(P=.003)。与组 1 相比,组 2 的透视时间(53±9min 与 84±21min,P<.001)和手术时间(2.4±1.4h 与 3.6±1.1h,P<.001)明显缩短。
全身麻醉的使用与单次手术的更高治愈率相关,并且似乎降低了重复消融时观察到的 PV 再连接的发生率。