INSERM, U562, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA/SAC/DSV/DRM/Neurospin Center, Bât 145, Point Courier 156, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Dec;14(12):542-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
Attaching meaning to arbitrary symbols (i.e. words) is a complex and lengthy process. In the case of numbers, it was previously suggested that this process is grounded on two early pre-verbal systems for numerical quantification: the approximate number system (ANS or 'analogue magnitude'), and the object tracking system (OTS or 'parallel individuation'), which children are equipped with before symbolic learning. Each system is based on dedicated neural circuits, characterized by specific computational limits, and each undergoes a separate developmental trajectory. Here, I review the available cognitive and neuroscientific data and argue that the available evidence is more consistent with a crucial role for the ANS, rather than for the OTS, in the acquisition of abstract numerical concepts that are uniquely human.
赋予任意符号(即单词)意义是一个复杂而漫长的过程。在数字的情况下,此前有人提出,这个过程基于两个用于数字量化的早期前言语系统:近似数量系统(ANS 或“模拟大小”)和物体跟踪系统(OTS 或“并行个体化”),儿童在符号学习之前就具备了这两个系统。每个系统都基于专门的神经回路,具有特定的计算限制,并且每个系统都经历单独的发展轨迹。在这里,我回顾了现有的认知和神经科学数据,并认为现有证据更支持 ANS 在人类独特的抽象数字概念习得中发挥关键作用,而不是 OTS。