Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4920, USA.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2010 Nov-Dec;31(9):694-704. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181f17b09.
To examine the general pediatric health care quality experiences of children and youth with mental health impairment.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 2006 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey data for children and youth aged 5 to 17 years (n = 7263). Mental health impairment was defined using the recommended cut-point (score ≥ 16) on the parent version of the Columbia Impairment Scale. Health care quality was measured with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems including parent ratings in 3 domains: provider communication, getting needed care, and getting care quickly. Logistic regression was used to test associations between mental health impairment and dichotomized Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems measures (poor vs good quality) adjusted for demographic characteristics, health insurance, and socioeconomic status. Analysis was conducted with Stata, Version 10.1 SE, and all estimates accounted for the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey complex sampling design.
In multivariable analysis, health care experiences of children with mental health impairment (versus those without) were consistently rated less favorably by parents, with greater odds of inferior quality of care ratings in all domains: getting needed care (odds ratio [OR] = 2.35), getting care quickly (OR = 1.41), physician communication (OR = 1.72), and overall health care quality (OR = 1.63).
Further research is needed to identify specific aspects of care that families find problematic in relation to the organization and delivery of care within each quality domain. Interventions are needed to improve service systems for children and youth with mental health impairment, especially to support access to needed care.
考察有心理健康障碍的儿童和青少年的一般儿科保健质量体验。
我们对 2006 年医疗支出面板调查数据进行了横断面分析,调查对象为 5 至 17 岁的儿童和青少年(n=7263)。使用家长版哥伦比亚损伤量表(Columbia Impairment Scale)的推荐切点(得分≥16)定义心理健康损伤。使用包括家长在 3 个领域的评价的医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估(Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems)来衡量保健质量:提供者沟通、获得所需的护理和快速获得护理。使用 logistic 回归检验心理健康损伤与消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统(Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems)二分测量值(护理质量差与好)之间的关联,调整了人口统计学特征、健康保险和社会经济地位。使用 Stata 版本 10.1 SE 进行分析,所有估计均考虑了医疗支出面板调查的复杂抽样设计。
在多变量分析中,有心理健康损伤的儿童的保健体验(与没有损伤的儿童相比)一直受到家长的较差评价,在所有领域获得护理的质量评分都更差:获得所需的护理(优势比[OR]=2.35)、快速获得护理(OR=1.41)、医生沟通(OR=1.72)和整体医疗保健质量(OR=1.63)。
需要进一步研究,以确定与每个质量领域内的护理组织和提供相关的,家庭认为有问题的特定护理方面。需要干预措施来改善儿童和青少年心理健康损伤的服务系统,特别是要支持获得所需的护理。