Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Celal Bayar University, 45010, Manisa, Turkey.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;67(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0941-z. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
Oxymetazoline and xylometazoline are locally effective and direct acting drugs that relieve nasal congestion. The aim of this study was to objectively determine and compare the decongestive effects of oxymetazoline and xylometazoline in healthy subjects.
The study population comprised thirty healthy adults. All subjects underwent active anterior rhinomanometry (AARhm) and acoustic rhinometry (AR) tests following the application of oxymetazoline, xylometazoline, or placebo (physiological saline). The change in nasal resistance, nasal airflow, and different cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the nasal cavity in the subjects were examined for each solution separately. The measurements were obtained over a 1-h period (baseline and 1, 15, 30, and 60 min post-dosing). All results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test.
A total of 6,300 measurements of AARhm and AR were obtained. The application of placebo did not cause a statistically significant change in nasal resistance, nasal airflow, and CSAs (CSA1, 2, and 3, respectively) of the nasal cavity. In contrast, statistically significant changes in nasal resistance (inspiration p = 0.000 and p = 0.004; expiration p = 0.000 and p = 0.000), nasal airflow (inspiration p = 0.000 and p = 0.004; expiration p = 0.000 and p = 0.000), and CSAs of the nasal cavity (CSA2 p = 0.000 and p = 0.000, CSA3 p = 0.000 and p = 0.00), with the exception of CSA1 (p = 0.982 and p = 0.994), were obtained after the application of oxymetazoline and xylometazoline. A comparison of oxymetazoline and xylometazoline based on nasal resistance, nasal airflow, and CSAs of the nasal cavity demonstrated no statistically significant difference, except for CSA3.
Oxymetazoline and xylometazoline are fast-acting and potent topical decongestants that have similar decongestive effects.
羟甲唑啉和赛洛唑啉是局部有效且直接作用的药物,可缓解鼻塞。本研究旨在客观地确定和比较健康受试者中羟甲唑啉和赛洛唑啉的充血缓解作用。
研究人群包括 30 名健康成年人。所有受试者在使用羟甲唑啉、赛洛唑啉或安慰剂(生理盐水)后均进行主动前鼻测压法(AARhm)和鼻声反射测量法(AR)测试。分别检查每个溶液的鼻腔阻力、鼻气流和鼻腔不同横截面积(CSA)的变化。在 1 小时内(给药前和给药后 1、15、30 和 60 分钟)获得所有测量结果。所有结果均使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行分析。
共获得 6300 次 AARhm 和 AR 测量值。安慰剂的应用未引起鼻腔阻力、鼻气流和鼻腔 CSA(分别为 CSA1、2 和 3)的统计学显著变化。相比之下,鼻腔阻力的变化具有统计学意义(吸气 p = 0.000 和 p = 0.004;呼气 p = 0.000 和 p = 0.000)、鼻气流(吸气 p = 0.000 和 p = 0.004;呼气 p = 0.000 和 p = 0.000)和鼻腔 CSA(CSA2 p = 0.000 和 p = 0.000,CSA3 p = 0.000 和 p = 0.000),但 CSA1 除外(p = 0.982 和 p = 0.994),在使用羟甲唑啉和赛洛唑啉后获得。基于鼻腔阻力、鼻气流和鼻腔 CSA 对羟甲唑啉和赛洛唑啉进行比较,除 CSA3 外,未发现统计学显著差异。
羟甲唑啉和赛洛唑啉是快速起效且强效的局部减充血剂,具有相似的充血缓解作用。