• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业护理学会与循证实践:跨越质量鸿沟的策略

Professional nursing societies and evidence-based practice: strategies to cross the quality chasm.

作者信息

Mallory Gail A

机构信息

Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh, PA 15275, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2010 Nov-Dec;58(6):279-86. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.06.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2010.06.005
PMID:21074645
Abstract

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) published Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health Care System for the 21st Century nearly 10 years ago. Nursing societies are in a unique position to promote evidence-based practice (EBP). The purpose of this article is to describe EBP strategies that nursing societies can use to improve the quality of health care, thus decreasing the gap between research knowledge and practice. Nursing societies can take the lead in two key EBP activities: (1) development of evidence-based syntheses, systematic reviews, and guidelines for EBP; and (2) development, implementation, and testing strategies for these EBP resources to become available and used in clinical decision-making. The Oncology Nursing Society will be discussed as an exemplar of developing EBP programs and increasing knowledge of EBP and practice change resources for its members. The discussion stresses the importance of nursing society members and leaders in guiding their societies to contribute to the closing of the US health care quality chasm.

摘要

美国医学研究所(IOM)在近10年前发表了《跨越质量鸿沟:21世纪的新医疗体系》。护理学会在促进循证实践(EBP)方面具有独特地位。本文旨在描述护理学会可用于提高医疗质量的循证实践策略,从而缩小研究知识与实践之间的差距。护理学会可在两项关键的循证实践活动中发挥带头作用:(1)开展循证综合分析、系统评价以及循证实践指南;(2)制定、实施并测试相关策略,以使这些循证实践资源能够在临床决策中得到应用。将以肿瘤护理学会为例,探讨其如何开展循证实践项目,以及如何增加其会员对循证实践和实践变革资源的了解。讨论强调了护理学会成员和领导者在引导学会为缩小美国医疗质量鸿沟做出贡献方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
Professional nursing societies and evidence-based practice: strategies to cross the quality chasm.专业护理学会与循证实践:跨越质量鸿沟的策略
Nurs Outlook. 2010 Nov-Dec;58(6):279-86. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.06.005.
2
Collaborating across services to advance evidence-based nursing practice.跨部门协作,推进循证护理实践。
Nurs Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;59(1 Suppl):S11-21. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3c011.
3
Putting evidence into practice. Outcomes of using the ONS PEP resources.将证据应用于实践。使用国家统计局暴露后预防资源的结果。
ONS Connect. 2009 Apr;24(4):8-11.
4
Improving healthcare and outcomes for high-risk children and teens: formation of the National Consortium for Pediatric and Adolescent Evidence-Based Practice.改善高危儿童和青少年的医疗保健及治疗效果:成立国家儿科和青少年循证实践联盟。
Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Nov-Dec;33(6):525-9.
5
Guiding implementation: frameworks and resources for evidence translation.指导实施:证据转化的框架和资源。
J Nurs Adm. 2011 Dec;41(12):513-6. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182378bb0.
6
Implementing evidence-based practice: a mantra for clinical change.实施循证实践:临床变革的一则准则。
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2009 Jul-Sep;23(3):263-9; quiz 270-1. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181aedf2f.
7
An information technology infrastructure to enable evidence-based nursing practice.一个支持循证护理实践的信息技术基础设施。
Nurs Adm Q. 2009 Oct-Dec;33(4):317-24. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0b013e3181b9dd9d.
8
Evidence-based practice, step by step: implementing an evidence-based practice change.循证实践,步步为营:实施循证实践变革。
Am J Nurs. 2011 Mar;111(3):54-60. doi: 10.1097/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000395243.14347.7e.
9
Use of evidence-based practice in school nursing: survey of school nurses at a national conference.学校护理中循证实践的应用:在一次全国会议上对学校护士的调查
J Sch Nurs. 2009 Aug;25(4):302-13. doi: 10.1177/1059840509335008. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
10
Facilitation of evidence-based nursing practice during military operations.在军事行动中促进循证护理实践。
Nurs Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;59(1 Suppl):S75-9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3beac.

引用本文的文献

1
Do evidence summaries increase health policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review.证据总结能否增加卫生政策制定者对系统评价证据的使用?一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 10;14(1):1-52. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.8. eCollection 2018.
2
Feasibility of using algorithm-based clinical decision support for symptom assessment and management in lung cancer.基于算法的临床决策支持在肺癌症状评估与管理中的可行性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jan;49(1):13-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 29.
3
Creating computable algorithms for symptom management in an outpatient thoracic oncology setting.
为胸肿瘤门诊环境中的症状管理创建可计算算法。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Dec;46(6):911-924.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 May 13.