Suppr超能文献

一项比较达肝素和阿加曲班在伴有或不伴有血栓形成的肝素诱导血小板减少症患者中的随机、开放标签的初步研究:PREVENT-HIT 研究。

A randomized, open-label pilot study comparing desirudin and argatroban in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis: PREVENT-HIT Study.

机构信息

Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20815-6048, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ther. 2011 Jan;18(1):14-22. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181f65503.

Abstract

Because of an extreme risk for thromboemboli, patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) require immediate initiation of an alternative anticoagulant. The only therapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration require intravenous infusion of expensive direct thrombin inhibitors. This prospective, randomized, open-label, exploratory study compared the clinical and economic utility of subcutaneous desirudin vs argatroban, the most frequently used agent for suspected or immunologically confirmed HIT, with or without thrombosis. Sixteen patients were randomized to treatment with fixed-dose desirudin (15 or 30 mg) every 12 hours or activated partial thromboplastin time-adjusted argatroban by intravenous infusion. Arm A included 8 patients naive to direct thrombin inhibitor therapy, whereas Arm B included 8 patients on argatroban for at least 24 hours before randomization. The primary efficacy measure was the composite of new or worsening thrombosis (objectively documented), amputation, or death. Other end points included major and minor bleeding while on drug therapy, time to platelet count recovery, and pharmacoeconomics. No amputations or deaths occurred. One patient randomized to argatroban had worsening of an existing thrombosis. Major bleeding occurred in 2 patients on argatroban and in none during desirudin treatment. There was 1 minor bleed in each treatment group. The average medication cost per course of treatment was $1688 for desirudin and $8250 for argatroban. Desirudin warrants further study as a potentially cost-effective alternative to argatroban in patients with suspected HIT.

摘要

由于存在血栓栓塞的极高风险,疑似肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)患者需要立即启动替代抗凝治疗。美国食品和药物管理局批准的唯一疗法需要静脉输注昂贵的直接凝血酶抑制剂。这项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、探索性研究比较了皮下达肝素与阿加曲班(疑似或免疫确认的 HIT 最常使用的药物)在有或无血栓形成情况下的临床和经济效用。16 名患者被随机分为每 12 小时皮下给予固定剂量达肝素(15 或 30mg)或静脉输注调整后的激活部分凝血活酶时间的阿加曲班。A 组包括 8 名对直接凝血酶抑制剂治疗无经验的患者,而 B 组包括 8 名在随机分组前至少使用阿加曲班 24 小时的患者。主要疗效指标是新出现或恶化的血栓形成(客观记录)、截肢或死亡的复合终点。其他终点包括药物治疗期间的主要和次要出血、血小板计数恢复时间和药物经济学。没有发生截肢或死亡。1 名随机分组至阿加曲班的患者出现现有血栓形成恶化。阿加曲班治疗组有 2 名患者发生大出血,达肝素治疗组无大出血。每组各有 1 例轻微出血。每疗程的平均药物治疗费用分别为达肝素 1688 美元和阿加曲班 8250 美元。达肝素在疑似 HIT 患者中可能是一种具有成本效益的阿加曲班替代药物,值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验