• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较达肝素和阿加曲班在伴有或不伴有血栓形成的肝素诱导血小板减少症患者中的随机、开放标签的初步研究:PREVENT-HIT 研究。

A randomized, open-label pilot study comparing desirudin and argatroban in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis: PREVENT-HIT Study.

机构信息

Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20815-6048, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ther. 2011 Jan;18(1):14-22. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181f65503.

DOI:10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181f65503
PMID:21079512
Abstract

Because of an extreme risk for thromboemboli, patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) require immediate initiation of an alternative anticoagulant. The only therapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration require intravenous infusion of expensive direct thrombin inhibitors. This prospective, randomized, open-label, exploratory study compared the clinical and economic utility of subcutaneous desirudin vs argatroban, the most frequently used agent for suspected or immunologically confirmed HIT, with or without thrombosis. Sixteen patients were randomized to treatment with fixed-dose desirudin (15 or 30 mg) every 12 hours or activated partial thromboplastin time-adjusted argatroban by intravenous infusion. Arm A included 8 patients naive to direct thrombin inhibitor therapy, whereas Arm B included 8 patients on argatroban for at least 24 hours before randomization. The primary efficacy measure was the composite of new or worsening thrombosis (objectively documented), amputation, or death. Other end points included major and minor bleeding while on drug therapy, time to platelet count recovery, and pharmacoeconomics. No amputations or deaths occurred. One patient randomized to argatroban had worsening of an existing thrombosis. Major bleeding occurred in 2 patients on argatroban and in none during desirudin treatment. There was 1 minor bleed in each treatment group. The average medication cost per course of treatment was $1688 for desirudin and $8250 for argatroban. Desirudin warrants further study as a potentially cost-effective alternative to argatroban in patients with suspected HIT.

摘要

由于存在血栓栓塞的极高风险,疑似肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)患者需要立即启动替代抗凝治疗。美国食品和药物管理局批准的唯一疗法需要静脉输注昂贵的直接凝血酶抑制剂。这项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、探索性研究比较了皮下达肝素与阿加曲班(疑似或免疫确认的 HIT 最常使用的药物)在有或无血栓形成情况下的临床和经济效用。16 名患者被随机分为每 12 小时皮下给予固定剂量达肝素(15 或 30mg)或静脉输注调整后的激活部分凝血活酶时间的阿加曲班。A 组包括 8 名对直接凝血酶抑制剂治疗无经验的患者,而 B 组包括 8 名在随机分组前至少使用阿加曲班 24 小时的患者。主要疗效指标是新出现或恶化的血栓形成(客观记录)、截肢或死亡的复合终点。其他终点包括药物治疗期间的主要和次要出血、血小板计数恢复时间和药物经济学。没有发生截肢或死亡。1 名随机分组至阿加曲班的患者出现现有血栓形成恶化。阿加曲班治疗组有 2 名患者发生大出血,达肝素治疗组无大出血。每组各有 1 例轻微出血。每疗程的平均药物治疗费用分别为达肝素 1688 美元和阿加曲班 8250 美元。达肝素在疑似 HIT 患者中可能是一种具有成本效益的阿加曲班替代药物,值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
A randomized, open-label pilot study comparing desirudin and argatroban in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis: PREVENT-HIT Study.一项比较达肝素和阿加曲班在伴有或不伴有血栓形成的肝素诱导血小板减少症患者中的随机、开放标签的初步研究:PREVENT-HIT 研究。
Am J Ther. 2011 Jan;18(1):14-22. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181f65503.
2
Rationale and design of the PREVENT-HIT study: a randomized, open-label pilot study to compare desirudin and argatroban in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis.预防-HIT 研究的原理和设计:一项比较依诺肝素和阿加曲班在疑似肝素诱导的血小板减少症伴或不伴血栓形成患者中的随机、开放标签的初步研究。
Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):626-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.012.
3
Argatroban anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.阿加曲班用于肝素诱导的血小板减少症患者的抗凝治疗。
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(15):1849-56. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.15.1849.
4
Argatroban therapy for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in acutely ill patients.阿加曲班治疗急性病患者肝素诱导的血小板减少症。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2007 Oct;13(4):353-61. doi: 10.1177/1076029607303617.
5
Evaluation of treatment with direct thrombin inhibitors in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.肝素诱导的血小板减少症患者使用直接凝血酶抑制剂治疗的评估。
Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Apr;26(4):461-8. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.4.461.
6
Argatroban anticoagulation for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in elderly patients.阿加曲班用于老年肝素诱导的血小板减少症患者的抗凝治疗。
Drugs Aging. 2007;24(6):489-99. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200724060-00005.
7
Argatroban anticoagulant therapy in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.阿加曲班用于肝素诱导的血小板减少症患者的抗凝治疗。
Circulation. 2001 Apr 10;103(14):1838-43. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.14.1838.
8
Argatroban: a review of its use in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.阿加曲班:关于其在肝素诱导的血小板减少症管理中的应用综述
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2009;9(4):261-82. doi: 10.2165/1120090-000000000-00000.
9
Argatroban anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia requiring renal replacement therapy.阿加曲班用于需要肾脏替代治疗的肝素诱导的血小板减少症患者的抗凝治疗。
Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Oct;39(10):1601-5. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G033. Epub 2005 Aug 30.
10
Efficacy and safety of argatroban and bivalirudine in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.阿加曲班和比伐卢定在疑似肝素诱导的血小板减少症患者中的疗效和安全性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Feb;49(2):178-84. doi: 10.1177/1060028014562949. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
New Trends, Advantages and Disadvantages in Anticoagulation and Coating Methods Used in Extracorporeal Life Support Devices.体外生命支持设备中抗凝及涂层方法的新趋势、优点与缺点
Membranes (Basel). 2021 Aug 12;11(8):617. doi: 10.3390/membranes11080617.
2
Comparative effectiveness and safety of anticoagulants for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.抗凝剂治疗肝素诱导血小板减少症的疗效和安全性比较。
Am J Hematol. 2021 Jul 1;96(7):805-815. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26194. Epub 2021 May 3.
3
Superior outcomes with Argatroban for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
阿加曲班治疗肝素诱导的血小板减少症的疗效更佳:贝叶斯网状meta 分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Aug;43(4):825-838. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01260-z. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
4
Prognostic factors for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review.肝素诱导的血小板减少症患者的预后因素:系统评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Jun;43(3):449-460. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01166-2. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
5
Heparin induced thrombocytopenia in critically ill: Diagnostic dilemmas and management conundrums.危重症患者的肝素诱导性血小板减少症:诊断困境与管理难题
World J Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug 4;4(3):202-12. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i3.202.
6
Design of the rivaroxaban for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study.利伐沙班用于肝素诱导的血小板减少症研究的设计。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014 Nov;38(4):485-92. doi: 10.1007/s11239-014-1064-7.
7
Prospective observational evaluation of the particle immunofiltration anti-platelet factor 4 rapid assay in MICU patients with thrombocytopenia.对重症监护病房(MICU)血小板减少患者进行颗粒免疫过滤抗血小板因子4快速检测的前瞻性观察性评估。
Crit Care. 2013 Jul 22;17(4):R143. doi: 10.1186/cc12822.
8
Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.肝素诱导的血小板减少症的治疗和预防:抗血栓治疗与血栓预防,第 9 版:美国胸科医师学会基于证据的临床实践指南。
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e495S-e530S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2303.
9
Challenges to the design and execution of controlled clinical studies of anticoagulants in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: lessons learned.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2012 Jan;33(1):124-8. doi: 10.1007/s11239-011-0634-1.
10
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: present and future.肝素诱导的血小板减少症:现状与未来。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2011 Apr;31(3):353-66. doi: 10.1007/s11239-011-0569-6.