Weber D, Borisch N, Harstall R, Hechenbichler D
Orthopädie/Traumatologie, St. Claraspital, Basel, Schweiz.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2010 Dec;148(6):704-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1250470. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
Injuries of the sternoclavicular joint are rare. Probably these injuries are frequently missed. Distorsion type lesions mostly heal uneventfully. Their diagnosis and treatment may be demanding. Untreated, a dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint and dislocation fractures may lead to considerable discomfort or even a risk for neurovascular damage. This work focuses on the anatomy and lesions of the sternoclavicular joint, the pathomechanism of the injury and the treatment options according to our acute trauma-patient collective.
Five patients with sternoclavicular impairment have been assessed. Radiological evaluation consisted in standard chest X-rays. In the situation of a fracture and/or complete luxation, CT scans of the sternoclavicular joints were additionally performed. Two of our patients underwent surgery (one osteosynthesis with a plate and one reduction and ligament reconstruction were performed), in one case dislocation was reduced in a closed way in a short-lasting general anaesthesia and in two cases conservative treatment was performed.
In all cases the chosen treatment protocol led to symmetrical arm function and all patients were pain-free 2 to 6 months after the injury. In one patient the plate was removed 4 months after osteosynthesis.
Distorsions of the sternoclavicular joints are probably underdiagnosed and often mildly symptomatic. Conservative treatment usually leads to satisfying functional results with significant pain reduction. Non-reducible dislocations and dislocation fractures have to be treated operatively. Many different open procedures have been described, such as ligament reconstructions and osteosynthesis. The postoperative results are generally good, but operative treatment may be difficult and at risk for complications. Indications for operative treatment of joint subluxation should be strictly limited because of the high risk of accompanying neurovascular impairment during manipulation and fixation.
胸锁关节损伤较为罕见。这些损伤可能常常被漏诊。扭伤型损伤大多能顺利愈合。其诊断和治疗可能颇具挑战性。未经治疗,胸锁关节脱位和脱位骨折可能导致相当大的不适,甚至有神经血管损伤的风险。本研究聚焦于胸锁关节的解剖结构与损伤、损伤的病理机制以及根据我们的急性创伤患者群体所采用的治疗方案。
对5例胸锁关节损伤患者进行了评估。影像学评估包括标准胸部X线检查。在发生骨折和/或完全脱位的情况下,还额外进行了胸锁关节的CT扫描。我们的2例患者接受了手术治疗(1例采用钢板内固定,1例进行了复位和韧带重建),1例在短暂全身麻醉下进行了闭合复位,2例采用保守治疗。
在所有病例中,所选用的治疗方案均使手臂功能对称,所有患者在受伤后2至6个月均无疼痛。1例患者在钢板内固定术后4个月取出了钢板。
胸锁关节扭伤可能诊断不足,且通常症状较轻。保守治疗通常能取得令人满意的功能结果,疼痛显著减轻。不可复位的脱位和脱位骨折必须进行手术治疗。已经描述了许多不同的开放手术方法,如韧带重建和内固定。术后结果总体良好,但手术治疗可能难度较大且有并发症风险。由于在操作和固定过程中伴有神经血管损伤的高风险,关节半脱位的手术治疗指征应严格限制。