Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, CH 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 9;363(24):2310-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009406. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
Recent data have suggested that patients with coronary disease in large arteries are at increased risk for late cardiac events after percutaneous intervention with first-generation drug-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents. We sought to confirm this observation and to assess whether this increase in risk was also seen with second-generation drug-eluting stents.
We randomly assigned 2314 patients needing stents that were 3.0 mm or more in diameter to receive sirolimus-eluting, everolimus-eluting, or bare-metal stents. The primary end point was the composite of death from cardiac causes or nonfatal myocardial infarction at 2 years. Late events (occurring during months 7 to 24) and target-vessel revascularization were the main secondary end points.
The rates of the primary end point were 2.6% among patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents, 3.2% among those receiving everolimus-eluting stents, and 4.8% among those receiving bare-metal stents, with no significant differences between patients receiving either drug-eluting stent and those receiving bare-metal stents. There were also no significant between-group differences in the rate of late events or in the rate of death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. Rates of target-vessel revascularization for reasons unrelated to myocardial infarction were 3.7% among patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents, 3.1% among those receiving everolimus-eluting stents, and 8.9% among those receiving bare-metal stents. The rate of target-vessel revascularization was significantly reduced among patients receiving either drug-eluting stent, as compared with a bare-metal stent, with no significant difference between the two types of drug-eluting stents.
In patients requiring stenting of large coronary arteries, no significant differences were found among sirolimus-eluting, everolimus-eluting, and bare-metal stents with respect to the rate of death or myocardial infarction. With the two drug-eluting stents, similar reductions in rates of target-vessel revascularization were seen. (Funded by the Basel Cardiovascular Research Foundation and the Swiss National Foundation for Research; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN72444640.).
最近的数据表明,与裸金属支架相比,接受第一代药物洗脱支架经皮介入治疗的大血管冠状动脉疾病患者发生晚期心脏事件的风险增加。我们旨在证实这一观察结果,并评估这种风险增加是否也见于第二代药物洗脱支架。
我们将 2314 名需要植入直径 3.0 毫米或以上支架的患者随机分配至接受西罗莫司洗脱支架、依维莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗。主要终点是 2 年内因心脏原因死亡或非致死性心肌梗死的复合终点。晚期事件(发生在第 7 至 24 个月期间)和靶血管血运重建是主要次要终点。
接受西罗莫司洗脱支架的患者中,主要终点的发生率为 2.6%,接受依维莫司洗脱支架的患者中为 3.2%,接受裸金属支架的患者中为 4.8%,接受药物洗脱支架与接受裸金属支架的患者之间无显著差异。晚期事件发生率或死亡率、心肌梗死发生率或支架血栓形成发生率在各组之间也无显著差异。因与心肌梗死无关的原因行靶血管血运重建的发生率分别为接受西罗莫司洗脱支架的患者为 3.7%,接受依维莫司洗脱支架的患者为 3.1%,接受裸金属支架的患者为 8.9%。与裸金属支架相比,接受任何一种药物洗脱支架的患者的靶血管血运重建率均显著降低,而两种药物洗脱支架之间无显著差异。
在需要大冠状动脉支架置入的患者中,西罗莫司洗脱支架、依维莫司洗脱支架和裸金属支架在死亡率或心肌梗死发生率方面无显著差异。两种药物洗脱支架均使靶血管血运重建率显著降低。(由巴塞尔心血管研究基金会和瑞士国家科学基金会资助;当前对照试验编号,ISRCTN72444640。)