Suppr超能文献

抗癫痫药物的通用替代。

Generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs.

机构信息

UCL Institute for Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Expert Rev Neurother. 2010 Dec;10(12):1887-98. doi: 10.1586/ern.10.163.

Abstract

Substitution of antiepileptic drugs with generic formulations may affect individual people, as well as healthcare systems. Analyses of large medical claims databases suggest that generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs is associated with increased morbidity and greater use of healthcare resources. While a single brand-to-generic switch may be associated with a slight increase in overall medical costs, multiple switches may be associated with higher costs, perhaps because different generic agents are not required to be bioequivalent to each other. Generic substitution also affects the individual: along with the possible increased risk of seizures or adverse events, inconsistency of supply may make the medication appear unfamiliar, thus discouraging adherence. Importantly, substitution is often carried out at the dispensing level, without the knowledge or consent of physicians and affected individuals. Therefore, regulatory and professional bodies advocate that substitution should not be carried out without specific counseling of the individual by healthcare professionals on the details and implications of the change.

摘要

抗癫痫药物的仿制药替代可能会影响个人,也会影响医疗保健系统。对大型医疗索赔数据库的分析表明,抗癫痫药物的仿制药替代与发病率增加和更多医疗资源的使用有关。虽然单一品牌到仿制药的转换可能与整体医疗成本略有增加有关,但多次转换可能与更高的成本有关,因为不同的仿制药不一定需要彼此生物等效。仿制药替代也会影响个人:除了可能增加癫痫发作或不良事件的风险外,供应的不一致性可能会使药物看起来不熟悉,从而阻碍患者坚持用药。重要的是,替代通常是在配药层面进行的,而医生和受影响的个人并不了解或同意这种替代。因此,监管和专业机构主张,在没有医疗保健专业人员就变更的细节和影响向个人提供具体咨询的情况下,不应进行替代。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验