Public Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Nov 19;10:83. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-83.
Much has been written in the educational literature on the value of communities of practise in enhancing student learning. Here, we take the experience of senior undergraduate medical students involved in short-term research as a member of a team as a paradigm for learning in a community of practise. Based on feedback from experienced supervisors, we offer recommendations for initiating students into the research culture of their team. In so doing, we endeavour to create a bridge between theory and practise through disseminating advice on good supervisory practise, where the supervisor is perceived as an educator responsible for designing the research process to optimize student learning.
Using the questionnaire design tool SurveyMonkey and comprehensive lists of contact details of staff who had supervised research projects at the University of Edinburgh during 1995-2008, current and previous supervisors were invited to recommend procedures which they had found successful in initiating students into the research culture of a team. Text responses were then coded in the form of derivative recommendations and categorized under general themes and sub-themes.
Using the chi-square tests of linear trend and association, evidence was found for a positive trend towards more experienced supervisors offering responses (χ2 = 16.833, p < 0.0005, n = 215) while there was a lack of evidence of bias in the gender distribution of respondents (χ2 = 0.482, p = 0.487, n = 203), respectively. A total of 126 codes were extracted from the text responses of 65 respondents. These codes were simplified to form a complete list of 52 recommendations, which were in turn categorized under seven derivative overarching themes, the most highly represented themes being Connecting the student with others and Cultivating self-efficacy in research competence.
Through the design of a coding frame for supervisor responses, a wealth of ideas has been captured to make communities of research practise effective mediums for undergraduate student learning. The majority of these recommendations are underpinned by educational theory and have the potential to take the learner beyond the stage of initiation to that of integration within their community of research practise.
教育文献中大量论述了实践共同体在促进学生学习方面的价值。在这里,我们以参与短期研究的高年级医学生作为团队成员的经验为例,将其作为实践共同体中学习的范例。基于有经验的导师的反馈,我们为指导学生融入团队的研究文化提供了建议。通过传播有关良好监督实践的建议,我们努力在理论与实践之间架起桥梁,在这种实践中,导师被视为负责设计研究过程以优化学生学习的教育者。
使用问卷设计工具 SurveyMonkey 和 1995-2008 年期间在爱丁堡大学监督研究项目的员工的综合联系信息列表,邀请现任和前任导师推荐他们认为成功将学生引入团队研究文化的程序。然后,以衍生建议的形式对文本回复进行编码,并根据一般主题和子主题进行分类。
使用线性趋势和关联的卡方检验,发现经验更丰富的导师提供回复的趋势呈正相关(χ2=16.833,p<0.0005,n=215),而在回复者的性别分布方面没有发现偏倚的证据(χ2=0.482,p=0.487,n=203)。从 65 位受访者的文本回复中提取了 126 个代码。这些代码被简化为一个完整的 52 条建议列表,这些建议又分为七个衍生的总体主题,最具代表性的主题是将学生与他人联系起来和培养研究能力的自我效能。
通过设计导师回复的编码框架,我们收集了丰富的想法,使研究实践共同体成为促进本科生学习的有效媒介。这些建议中的大多数都得到了教育理论的支持,并有潜力将学习者从入门阶段提升到融入他们的研究实践共同体的阶段。