Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Medical School Houston, Memorial Hermann Heart and Vascular Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Dec;140(6 Suppl):S131-5; discussion S142-S146. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.058.
Monitoring during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair has included the use of cerebrospinal fluid drainage and motor and somatosensory evoked potentials. We report our experience with neuromonitoring-guided thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Between November 2008 and January 2010, 105 thoracic aorta repairs were performed; 89% of patients (93/105) underwent repair using cerebrospinal fluid drainage and distal aortic perfusion. In addition, somatosensory and motor evoked potentials were monitored during repair, and active intraoperative maneuvers were undertaken in response to changes in the signals. Intraoperative maneuvers included intercostal artery reimplantation.
In-hospital mortality for thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair was 5.7% (6/105). Immediate spinal cord injury occurred in 1 patient (1%), and 3 patients (3%) had delayed neurologic deficit. Intercostal arteries were reattached in 85% of possible cases (51/60). Somatosensory evoked potentials achieved adequate readings in 99% of cases (102/103). Loss of somatosensory evoked potential was encountered in 26% of cases (27/102), and return of somatosensory evoked potentials occurred in all cases after intraoperative maneuvers. Motor evoked potentials achieved adequate readings in 96% of cases (99/103). Loss of motor evoked potential was encountered in 50% of cases (50/99), and return of motor evoked potentials occurred in all but 1 case (95%). This patient awoke with an immediate spinal neurologic deficit.
Neuromonitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials seems useful during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Alterations in intraoperative conduct resulted in return of neuromonitoring signals. This suggests a benefit in intercostal artery reimplantation via increasing perfusion to the collateral network of the spinal cord. Further studies using neuromonitoring-guided repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms are warranted.
胸主动脉腹主动脉瘤修复过程中的监测包括使用脑脊液引流和运动及体感诱发电位。我们报告了在神经监测指导下进行胸腹主动脉瘤修复的经验。
2008 年 11 月至 2010 年 1 月,共进行了 105 例胸主动脉修复手术;89%的患者(93/105)采用脑脊液引流和远端主动脉灌注进行修复。此外,在修复过程中监测体感和运动诱发电位,并根据信号变化主动进行术中操作。术中操作包括肋间动脉再植入。
胸主动脉和胸腹主动脉修复的院内死亡率为 5.7%(6/105)。1 例(1%)发生即刻脊髓损伤,3 例(3%)发生迟发性神经功能缺损。在可能的情况下,85%的肋间动脉被重新连接(51/60)。99%的病例(102/103)获得了足够的体感诱发电位读数。26%的病例(27/102)出现体感诱发电位丢失,所有病例在术中操作后体感诱发电位均恢复。96%的病例(99/103)获得了足够的运动诱发电位读数。50%的病例(50/99)出现运动诱发电位丢失,除 1 例外,所有病例的运动诱发电位均恢复(95%)。该患者醒来时即出现脊髓神经功能缺损。
在胸腹主动脉瘤修复过程中使用体感诱发电位和运动诱发电位进行神经监测似乎是有用的。术中行为的改变导致了神经监测信号的恢复。这表明通过增加脊髓侧支网络的灌注,肋间动脉再植入是有益的。需要进一步的研究来使用神经监测指导胸腹主动脉瘤的修复。