Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, UCLA Center for Health Services and Society, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;49(12):1225-37, 1237.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.08.012. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
To examine whether clinical severity is greater among children receiving attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) care in primary care compared with those in specialty mental health clinics, and to examine how care processes and clinical outcomes vary by sector across three 6-month time intervals.
This was a longitudinal cohort study of 530 children aged 5 to 11 years receiving ADHD care in primary care or specialty mental health clinics from November 2004 through September 2006 in a large, countywide managed care Medicaid program.
Clinical severity at study entry did not differ between children who received ADHD care in solely primary or specialty mental health care clinics. At three 6-month intervals, receipt of no care ranged from 34% to 44%, and unmet need for mental health services ranged from 13% to 20%. In primary care, 80% to 85% of children had at least one stimulant prescription filled and averaged one to two follow-up visits per year. Less than one-third of children in specialty mental health clinics received any stimulant medication, but all received psychosocial interventions averaging more than five visits per month. In both sectors, stimulant medication refill prescription persistence was poor (31%-49%). With few exceptions, ADHD diagnosis, impairment, academic achievement, parent distress, and parent-reported treatment satisfaction, perceived benefit, and improved family functioning did not differ between children who remained in care and those who received no care.
Areas for quality improvement are alignment of clinical severity with provider type, follow-up visits, stimulant use in specialty mental health, agency data infrastructure to document delivery of evidence-based psychosocial treatment, and stimulant medication refill prescription persistence.
研究在初级保健中接受注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)治疗的儿童与在专业心理健康诊所接受治疗的儿童相比,其临床严重程度是否更高,并研究在三个 6 个月时间间隔内,不同部门的治疗过程和临床结果如何有所不同。
这是一项纵向队列研究,纳入了 2004 年 11 月至 2006 年 9 月在一个大型县范围管理式医疗 Medicaid 计划中,在初级保健或专业心理健康诊所接受 ADHD 治疗的 530 名年龄在 5 至 11 岁的儿童。
在研究开始时,仅在初级保健或专业心理健康诊所接受 ADHD 治疗的儿童的临床严重程度无差异。在三个 6 个月的时间间隔内,无治疗的比例从 34%到 44%不等,精神卫生服务需求未得到满足的比例从 13%到 20%不等。在初级保健中,80%至 85%的儿童至少有一次服用兴奋剂处方,平均每年有一到两次随访。不到三分之一的在专业心理健康诊所的儿童接受任何兴奋剂药物治疗,但所有儿童都接受了平均每月超过五次的心理社会干预措施。在两个部门中,兴奋剂药物续方处方的坚持率都很差(31%-49%)。除了少数例外,ADHD 诊断、损伤、学业成绩、父母困扰、以及父母报告的治疗满意度、感知获益和改善家庭功能,在继续接受治疗的儿童和未接受治疗的儿童之间没有差异。
需要改进的领域包括将临床严重程度与提供者类型、随访次数、在专业心理健康领域中使用兴奋剂、机构数据基础设施以记录提供基于证据的心理社会治疗,以及兴奋剂药物续方处方的坚持率相匹配。