Tereshchenko Larisa G, Cheng Alan, Fetics Barry J, Butcher Barbara, Marine Joseph E, Spragg David D, Sinha Sunil, Dalal Darshan, Calkins Hugh, Tomaselli Gordon F, Berger Ronald D
The Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Electrocardiol. 2011 Mar-Apr;44(2):208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.08.012. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
We proposed and tested a novel electrocardiogram marker of risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).
Digital orthogonal electrocardiograms were recorded at rest before implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in 508 participants of a primary prevention ICDs prospective cohort study (mean ± SD age, 60 ± 12 years; 377 male [74%]). The sum magnitude of the absolute QRST integral in 3 orthogonal leads (SAI QRST) was calculated. A derivation cohort of 128 patients was used to define a cutoff; a validation cohort (n = 380) was used to test a predictive value.
During a mean follow-up of 18 months, 58 patients received appropriate ICD therapies. The SAI QRST was lower in patients with VA (105.2 ± 60.1 vs 138.4 ± 85.7 mV ms, P = .002). In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, patients with SAI QRST not exceeding 145 mV ms had about 4-fold higher risk of VA (hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.96-6.71; P < .0001) and a 6-fold higher risk of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (hazard ratio, 6.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-29.69; P = .014), whereas prediction of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation did not reach statistical significance.
High SAI QRST is associated with low risk of sustained VA in patients with structural heart disease.
我们提出并测试了一种用于评估室性心律失常(VA)风险的新型心电图标志物。
在一项原发性预防植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)前瞻性队列研究的508名参与者中,于植入ICD前静息状态下记录数字正交心电图(平均±标准差年龄,60±12岁;377名男性[74%])。计算3个正交导联中绝对QRST积分的总和幅度(SAI QRST)。128例患者的推导队列用于确定临界值;验证队列(n = 380)用于测试预测价值。
在平均18个月的随访期间,58例患者接受了适当的ICD治疗。VA患者的SAI QRST较低(105.2±60.1对138.4±85.7 mV·ms,P = 0.002)。在Cox比例风险分析中,SAI QRST不超过145 mV·ms的患者发生VA的风险高约4倍(风险比,3.6;95%置信区间,1.96 - 6.71;P < 0.0001),发生单形性室性心动过速的风险高6倍(风险比,6.58;95%置信区间,1.46 - 29.69;P = 0.014),而对多形性室性心动过速或心室颤动的预测未达到统计学显著性。
在结构性心脏病患者中,高SAI QRST与持续性VA的低风险相关。