St. Cloud State University, Community Psychology, St. Cloud, MN 56301-4498, USA.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):836-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
We examined the effects of an establishing operation (EO) and abolishing operation (AO) on stimulus control of challenging behavior. Two participants with developmental disabilities and challenging behavior participated. In Phase I, a functional analysis was conducted to identify the consequences maintaining challenging behavior. In Phase II, a discrimination between SD and SΔ was trained. In Phase III, pre-session MOs (i.e., EO and AO conditions) were arranged to assess their effects on challenging behavior. Finally in Phase IV, in addition to manipulating pre-session MOs the challenging behavior was evaluated under extinction in both SD and SΔ conditions. Results indicated that in the context of extinction when pre-session EO and AO conditions were manipulated, responding not only became differentiated but was higher in both SD and SΔ conditions in the pre-session EO condition when compared to the pre-session AO condition.
我们考察了建立操作(EO)和消除操作(AO)对挑战性行为的刺激控制的影响。两名具有发育障碍和挑战性行为的参与者参加了研究。在第一阶段,进行了功能分析以确定维持挑战性行为的后果。在第二阶段,训练了 SD 和 SΔ之间的辨别。在第三阶段,安排了会前 MOs(即 EO 和 AO 条件),以评估它们对挑战性行为的影响。最后,在第四阶段,除了操纵会前 MOs 之外,还在 SD 和 SΔ条件下的消退中评估了挑战性行为。结果表明,在消退的情况下,当操纵会前 EO 和 AO 条件时,与会前 AO 条件相比,不仅在 SD 和 SΔ条件下的反应变得分化,而且在会前 EO 条件下的反应更高。