• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄的临床转归:诊断时 STS 评分的重要性。

Clinical outcome of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis with medical and surgical management: importance of STS score at diagnosis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Dec;90(6):1876-83. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.07.070.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.07.070
PMID:21095330
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score aims at predicting operative mortality in cardiac surgery. The value of this score in predicting short- and long-term survival with medical or surgical management in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) is unknown.

METHODS

In a cohort of 694 patients (aged 71 ± 11 years) with isolated, asymptomatic severe AS (velocity ≥4 m/s), STS score was calculated at baseline and its link to survival analyzed. Patients were stratified by STS score less than 4%, 4% to 6.5%, and 6.5% or greater.

RESULTS

The STS score showed no association with operative mortality within 1 year of diagnosis or any time (1%, 2.9%, and 6.1%, respectively, by strata; p = 0.08) and a weak association with 1-year survival (p = 0.04). Conversely, long-term survival (10-year) was strongly predicted by STS score strata (78%, 47%, and 16%, respectively; p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, STS score independently predicted mortality (hazard ratio/1%, 1.15 [1.12 to 1.18], p < 0.0001) or cardiac death (1.21 [1.17 to 1.25], p < 0.0001). Aortic valve replacement within 1 year of diagnosis markedly improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.58, p < 0.001). However, benefit of early surgery varied according to strata, with no overt benefit with low score (p = 0.83), whereas early surgery considerably improved survival in the intermediate strata (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with asymptomatic severe AS, STS score is a powerful tool for predicting long-term outcome and for selecting patients (particularly those at intermediate risk) who benefit markedly from early surgery. Hence, risk-scoring using STS score should be routinely performed in patients with AS to support the clinical decision-making process.

摘要

背景

胸外科医师学会(STS)评分旨在预测心脏手术的手术死亡率。该评分在预测无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者接受药物或手术治疗的短期和长期生存率方面的价值尚不清楚。

方法

在一个 694 例孤立性、无症状重度 AS(速度≥4m/s)患者的队列中,在基线时计算 STS 评分,并分析其与生存的关系。根据 STS 评分<4%、4%~6.5%和≥6.5%将患者分层。

结果

STS 评分与诊断后 1 年内或任何时间的手术死亡率均无关联(各分层分别为 1%、2.9%和 6.1%;p=0.08),与 1 年生存率呈弱相关(p=0.04)。相反,STS 评分分层强烈预测长期生存(10 年)(分别为 78%、47%和 16%;p<0.0001)。多变量分析显示,STS 评分独立预测死亡率(每 1%的危险比为 1.15[1.12 至 1.18],p<0.0001)或心脏性死亡(1.21[1.17 至 1.25],p<0.0001)。诊断后 1 年内进行主动脉瓣置换术显著改善了生存率(校正后的危险比为 0.58,p<0.001)。然而,早期手术的获益因分层而异,低评分组(p=0.83)无明显获益,而中危分层患者早期手术显著改善了生存率(p<0.001)。

结论

对于无症状重度 AS 患者,STS 评分是预测长期预后和选择明显受益于早期手术的患者(尤其是中危患者)的有力工具。因此,应常规对 AS 患者进行 STS 评分风险评估,以支持临床决策过程。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcome of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis with medical and surgical management: importance of STS score at diagnosis.无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄的临床转归:诊断时 STS 评分的重要性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Dec;90(6):1876-83. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.07.070.
2
Operative risks and survival in veterans with severe aortic stenosis: surgery versus medical therapy.严重主动脉瓣狭窄退伍军人的手术风险和生存:手术与药物治疗。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Sep;92(3):866-72. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.028.
3
Management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄的管理
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Oct 14;52(16):1279-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.020.
4
Shifting the balance between aortic insufficiency and residual gradients after balloon aortic valvuloplasty.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 16;56(21):1750-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.024.
5
Aortic valve reinterventions after balloon aortic valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis intermediate and late follow-up.球囊主动脉瓣成形术治疗先天性主动脉瓣狭窄后主动脉瓣再干预:中期和晚期随访。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 16;56(21):1740-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.040.
6
Meta-analysis of prognostic value of stress testing in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者压力测试预后价值的Meta分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Oct 1;104(7):972-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.044.
7
Clinical outcomes in non-surgically managed patients with very severe versus severe aortic stenosis.未经手术治疗的极重度与重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的临床转归。
Heart. 2011 Dec;97(24):2029-32. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300137. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
8
Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome.使用第二代和当前第三代自膨胀CoreValve人工瓣膜对高危患者进行经皮主动脉瓣置换治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄:手术成功率及30天临床结局
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jul 3;50(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.047. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
9
How many patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis excluded for cardiac surgery are eligible for transcatheter heart valve implantation?有多少因严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄而被排除心脏手术的患者有资格进行经导管心脏瓣膜植入术?
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Oct;11(10):727-32. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328338940f.
10
Reasons for nonadherence to guidelines for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and potential solutions.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣置换指南不依从的原因及潜在解决方案。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 May 1;105(9):1339-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.056. Epub 2010 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Aortic Valve Replacement in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣置换术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 May 2;4(7):103663. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103663. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Sex difference in outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: follow-up data of the Netherlands Heart Registration.冠状动脉搭桥术后结局的性别差异:荷兰心脏注册研究的随访数据
Neth Heart J. 2025 Jan;33(1):26-33. doi: 10.1007/s12471-024-01920-5. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
3
Transcatheter Procedure Versus Surgical Interventions for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Contemporary Evaluation Against Conservative Management.
经导管手术与外科手术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:与保守治疗的当代评估
Cureus. 2024 Oct 19;16(10):e71859. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71859. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Saudi Heart Association/National Heart Center/Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society/Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons/Saudi Cardiac Imaging Group 2023 TAVI Guidelines.沙特心脏协会/国家心脏中心/沙特阿拉伯心脏介入学会/沙特心脏外科医生协会/沙特心脏影像小组2023年经导管主动脉瓣置入术指南
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 15;36(2):184-231. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1379. eCollection 2024.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of early aortic valve replacement versus conservative therapy in patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis with preserved left ventricle systolic function.系统评价和荟萃分析:对于左心室收缩功能正常的无症状主动脉瓣狭窄患者,早期主动脉瓣置换与保守治疗的比较。
Open Heart. 2024 Jan 8;11(1):e002511. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002511.
6
Management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄的管理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Open Heart. 2022 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001982.
7
Echocardiography and EuroSCORE II for the stratification of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.超声心动图和 EuroSCORE II 对低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄伴左心室射血分数保留患者的分层评估。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Nov;37(11):3169-3176. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02373-2. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
8
Cardiac Mechanics in Isolated Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease With Normal Ejection Fraction: A Study of Various Valvular Lesion Types.射血分数正常的孤立性二叶式主动脉瓣疾病的心脏力学:不同瓣膜病变类型的研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Nov;94(47):e2085. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002085.
9
Local versus general anesthesia for transfemoral aortic valve implantation.经股动脉主动脉瓣植入术的局部麻醉与全身麻醉比较。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Jan;101(1):45-53. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0362-8. Epub 2011 Sep 20.