Department of Nursing Studies, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 1;35(25):E1492-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ecf3fe.
This study was a retrospective cohort study.
To examine the criteria recommended in the literature for the school-based scoliosis screening program in Hong Kong.
School-based screening for scoliosis has been a controversy. Objectors to the policy were concerned about the high over-referral and false-positive rates. Recommendations were then made for improvement, but the feasibility of these recommendations has not been studied.
The cohort consisted of students in Grade 5 in 1995/1996 or 1996/1997 who underwent scoliosis screening in Hong Kong. Participants who had an angle of trunk rotation (ATR) ≥15°, 2 or more moiré lines, or presented significant clinical signs were referred for radiography. Screening histories and radiography records before the age of 19 years were extracted. The accuracy measures for different combinations of screening tests were examined.
There were 115,178 students in the cohort, of which 3228 (2.8%) were referred for radiography. Among the 1406 students who displayed a curve ≥20° during screening, 257 (18.3%) were boys and 336 (23.9%) were identified as 16 years or older, ruling out the suggestion of screening only 10-year-old girls. The sensitivity and positive predictive value for the current referral criteria were 88.1% and 43.6%, respectively. The sensitivity would drop substantially if the use of moiré topography (39.8%) or clinical signs (55.5%) were discarded. With the inclusion of these 2 tests, the clinical effectiveness measures were robust to the cutoff for ATR, unless it was set below 10°.
Selectively screening only premenarche girls was not feasible, as this screen would have missed a significant proportion of children with significant curvature. No refinement of the current protocol was necessary, although boys could be screened beginning at 12 years of age. The tandem use of ATR, moiré topography, and clinical signs was recommended for future studies.
本研究为回顾性队列研究。
研究香港学校脊柱侧凸筛查项目中文献推荐的标准。
学校脊柱侧凸筛查一直存在争议。反对该政策的人担心转诊过高和假阳性率过高。因此提出了改进建议,但这些建议的可行性尚未得到研究。
该队列包括 1995/1996 或 1996/1997 年五年级接受香港脊柱侧凸筛查的学生。ATR(躯干旋转角度)≥15°、2 条或更多云纹线或出现明显临床体征的患者被转诊进行放射检查。提取了 19 岁前的筛查史和放射记录。检查了不同筛查测试组合的准确性指标。
队列中有 115178 名学生,其中 3228 名(2.8%)被转诊进行放射检查。在筛查中显示≥20°曲线的 1406 名学生中,257 名(18.3%)为男生,336 名(23.9%)为 16 岁或以上,排除了仅筛查 10 岁女孩的建议。当前转诊标准的敏感性和阳性预测值分别为 88.1%和 43.6%。如果排除云纹地形学(39.8%)或临床体征(55.5%)的使用,敏感性会大幅下降。如果纳入这两项检查,除非 ATR 截断值设置在 10°以下,否则临床效果测量指标是稳健的。
选择性仅对初潮前的女孩进行筛查是不可行的,因为这种筛查会错过很大一部分有明显弯曲的儿童。目前的方案无需进一步细化,尽管可以从 12 岁开始对男孩进行筛查。建议在未来的研究中联合使用 ATR、云纹地形学和临床体征。