Suppr超能文献

双指数和单指数模型弥散加权成像在评估肾脏病变中的比较:初步经验。

Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential model of diffusion weighted imaging in evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary experience.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

Invest Radiol. 2011 May;46(5):285-91. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181ffc485.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To obtain intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters with biexponential analysis of multiple b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and compare these parameters to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained with monoexponential modeling in their ability to discriminate enhancing from nonenhancing renal lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients were imaged at 1.5 T utilizing contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and breath-hold DWI using 8 b values (range: 0-800 s/mm(2)). Perfusion fraction (f(p)), tissue diffusivity (D(t)), and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D(p)) were calculated using segmented biexponential analysis. ADC(total) and ADC(0-400-800) were calculated with monoexponential fitting of the DWI data. f(p), D(t), D(p), ADC(total), and ADC(0-400-800) were compared between enhancing and nonenhancing renal lesions. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for all DWI parameters. f(p) was correlated with percent enhancement.

RESULTS

There were a total of 31 renal lesions (15 enhancing and 16 nonenhancing) in 28 patients on CE-MRI. f(p) of enhancing masses was significantly higher (27.9 vs. 6.1) and D(t) was significantly lower (1.47 vs. 2.40 ×10(-3) mm(2)/s). IVIM parameters f(p) and D(t) demonstrated higher accuracy in differentiating enhancing from nonenhancing renal lesions compared with monoexponential parameters ADC(0-400-800) and ADC(total), with area under the curve of 0.946, 0.896, 0.854, and 0.675, respectively. There was a good correlation between f(p) and percent enhancement (r = 0.7; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

IVIM parameters f(p) and D(t) obtained with biexponential fitting of multi-b value DWI have higher accuracy compared with ADC (obtained with monoexponential fit) in discriminating enhancing from nonenhancing renal lesions. Furthermore, f(p) demonstrates good correlation with percent enhancement and can provide information regarding lesion vascularity without the use of exogenous contrast agent.

摘要

目的

通过双指数分析多 b 值扩散加权成像(DWI)获得体素内不相干运动(IVIM)参数,并比较这些参数与单指数模型获得的表观扩散系数(ADC)在鉴别增强和非增强肾病变方面的能力。

材料与方法

28 例患者在 1.5T 磁共振成像仪上进行对比增强(CE)磁共振成像和屏气 DWI 检查,共采集 8 个 b 值(范围:0-800 s/mm²)。采用分段双指数分析计算灌注分数(f(p))、组织弥散系数(D(t))和假性弥散系数(D(p))。利用 DWI 数据的单指数拟合计算 ADC(total)和 ADC(0-400-800)。比较增强和非增强肾病变之间的 f(p)、D(t)、D(p)、ADC(total)和 ADC(0-400-800)。对所有 DWI 参数进行受试者工作特征分析。f(p)与增强百分比相关。

结果

在 CE-MRI 上共发现 31 个肾病变(15 个增强,16 个非增强),其中增强病变的 f(p)明显较高(27.9%比 6.1%),D(t)明显较低(1.47×10(-3)mm²/s 比 2.40×10(-3)mm²/s)。与单指数参数 ADC(0-400-800)和 ADC(total)相比,IVIM 参数 f(p)和 D(t)在鉴别增强和非增强肾病变方面具有更高的准确性,曲线下面积分别为 0.946、0.896、0.854 和 0.675。f(p)与增强百分比之间存在良好的相关性(r=0.7;P<0.001)。

结论

通过双指数拟合多 b 值 DWI 获得的 IVIM 参数 f(p)和 D(t)在鉴别增强和非增强肾病变方面比 ADC(单指数拟合)具有更高的准确性。此外,f(p)与增强百分比之间具有良好的相关性,并且无需使用外源性对比剂即可提供关于病变血管生成的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验