Kalil Renato A K, Salles Felipe Borsu de, Giusti Imarilde Inês, Rodrigues Clarissa Garcia, Han Sang Won, Sant'Anna Roberto Tofani, Ludwig Eduardo, Grossman Gabriel, Prates Paulo Roberto Lunardi, Sant'anna João Ricardo Michelin, Teixeira Filho Guaracy Fernandes, Nardi Nance Beyer, Nesralla Ivo Abrahão
Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul/Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2010 Jul-Sep;25(3):311-21. doi: 10.1590/s0102-76382010000300006.
Safety, feasibility and early myocardial angiogenic effects evaluation of transthoracic intramyocardial phVEGF165 administration for refractory angina in no option patients.
Cohort study, in which 13 patients with refractory angina under optimized clinical treatment where included, after cineangiograms had been evaluated and found unfeasible by surgeon and interventional cardiologist. Intramyocardial injections of 5 mL solution containing plasmidial VEGF165 where done over the ischemic area of myocardium identified by previous SPECT/Sestamibi scan. Evaluations included a SPECT scan, stress test, Minnesota QOL questionnaire and NYHA functional class and CCS angina class determinations.
There were no deaths or new interventions during the study period. There were no significant variations in SPECT scans, QOL scores and stress tests results during medical treatment in the included patients. After the 3rd post operative month, there was improvement in SPECT segmental scores, SSS (18.38 ± 7.51 vs. 15.31 ± 7.29, P = 0.003) and SRS (11.92 ± 7.49 vs. 8.53 ± 6.68, P = 0.002). The ischemic area extension, however, had non-significant variation (23.38 ± 13.12% vs. 20.08 ± 13.88%, P = 0.1). Stress tests METs varied from 7.66 ± 4.47 pre to 10.29 ± 4.36 METs post-op (P = 0.08). QOL score improved from 48.23 ± 18.35 pre to 30.15 ± 20.13 post-op points (P = 0.02). NYHA class was 3.15 ± 0.38 pre vs. 1.77 ± 0.83 post-op (P = 0.001) and angina CCS class, 3.08 ± 0.64 vs. 1.77 ± 0.83 (P = 0.001).
Intramyocardial VEGF165 therapy for refractory angina, in this small trial of no option patients, resulted feasible and safe. Early clinical and scintilographic data showed improvements in symptoms and myocardial perfusion, with regression of ischemia severity in treated areas.
评估经胸心肌内注射质粒血管内皮生长因子165(phVEGF165)治疗无其他选择的难治性心绞痛患者的安全性、可行性及早期心肌血管生成效应。
队列研究,纳入13例经优化临床治疗后仍为难治性心绞痛的患者,这些患者经电影血管造影评估后,外科医生和介入心脏病专家认为其不适合其他治疗方法。通过先前的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)/锝-99m甲氧基异丁基异腈(Sestamibi)扫描确定心肌缺血区域,向该区域心肌内注射5 mL含质粒VEGF165的溶液。评估包括SPECT扫描、负荷试验、明尼苏达生活质量问卷以及纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级和加拿大心血管学会(CCS)心绞痛分级测定。
研究期间无死亡病例或新的干预措施。纳入患者在药物治疗期间,SPECT扫描、生活质量评分和负荷试验结果均无显著变化。术后第3个月后,SPECT节段评分、总和评分(SSS)(18.38±7.51对15.31±7.29,P = 0.003)和区域评分(SRS)(11.92±7.49对8.53±6.68,P = 0.002)有所改善。然而,缺血区域范围无显著变化(23.38±13.12%对20.08±13.88%,P = 0.1)。负荷试验的代谢当量(METs)从术前的7.66±4.47变化至术后的10.29±4.36(P = 0.08)。生活质量评分从术前的48.23±18.35分改善至术后的30.15±20.13分(P = 0.02)。NYHA分级术前为3.15±0.38,术后为1.77±0.83(P = 0.001),心绞痛CCS分级术前为3.08±0.64,术后为1.77±0.83(P = 0.001)。
在这项针对无其他选择患者的小型试验中,心肌内注射VEGF165治疗难治性心绞痛是可行且安全的。早期临床和闪烁扫描数据显示症状和心肌灌注有所改善,治疗区域的缺血严重程度有所减轻。