Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Cancer. 2010 Dec 1;116(23):5400-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25583. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
Sunitinib was a standard initial therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Given the fact that many patients progressed through many available therapies and antitumor activity had been demonstrated with sequential vascular endothelial growth factor-targeting approaches, a retrospective review was performed of the experience of rechallenge with sunitinib in sunitinib-refractory mRCC.
mRCC patients who received sunitinib therapy after disease progression on prior sunitinib and other therapy were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics, toxicity, clinical outcome, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) objective response rate, and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded.
Twenty-three mRCC patients who were rechallenged with sunitinib were identified. Upon rechallenge, 5 patients (22%) achieved an objective partial response. The median PFS with initial treatment was 13.7 months and 7.2 months with rechallenge. Patients with >6-month interval between sunitinib treatments had a longer PFS with rechallenge than patients who started the rechallenge within 6 months (median PFS, 16.5 vs 6.0 months; P=.03). There was no significant difference in outcome to sunitinib rechallenge based on number or mechanism of intervening treatments. Substantial new toxicity or significantly increased severity of prior toxicity was not seen during rechallenge in this cohort.
Sunitinib rechallenge had potential benefits and was tolerated in select metastatic RCC patients. Additional prospective investigation was warranted.
舒尼替尼是转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的标准初始治疗药物。鉴于许多患者在接受多种现有治疗方法后病情进展,并且序贯血管内皮生长因子靶向治疗方法已显示出抗肿瘤活性,因此对舒尼替尼难治性 mRCC 患者再次使用舒尼替尼进行了回顾性研究。
回顾性确定了在先前的舒尼替尼和其他治疗方案中疾病进展后接受舒尼替尼治疗的 mRCC 患者。记录了患者特征、毒性、临床结局、实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)客观缓解率和无进展生存期(PFS)。
确定了 23 名接受舒尼替尼再挑战的 mRCC 患者。再次挑战时,有 5 名患者(22%)达到客观部分缓解。初始治疗的中位 PFS 为 13.7 个月,再次挑战的中位 PFS 为 7.2 个月。与在 6 个月内开始再次挑战的患者相比,舒尼替尼治疗间隔 >6 个月的患者再次挑战的 PFS 更长(中位 PFS,16.5 与 6.0 个月;P=.03)。基于干预治疗的数量或机制,再次挑战舒尼替尼的结果没有显著差异。在该队列中,再次挑战期间没有出现新的明显毒性或先前毒性的严重程度显著增加。
舒尼替尼再次挑战对某些转移性 RCC 患者具有潜在益处且可耐受。需要进一步的前瞻性研究。