Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Apr;53(4):1130-9; discussion 1139-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.023. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
The Vascular Surgery Board (VSB) of the American Board of Surgery sought to answer the following questions: what is the scope of contemporary vascular surgery practice? Do current vascular surgery residents obtain training that is appropriate for their future career expectations and for successful Board certification? How effectively do practicing vascular surgeons incorporate emerging technologies and procedures into practice?
We analyzed the operative logs submitted to the VSB by recent vascular surgery residents applying for the Vascular Surgery Qualifying Examination (QE; 2006-2009) or by practicing vascular surgeons applying for the Vascular Surgery Recertification Examination (RE; 1995-2009). The relationship between reported operative experience and performance of the QE and RE was examined.
There has been a threefold increase in the mean number of primary cases reported by both RE and QE applicants over the past 15 years and the increase in case volume has been driven largely by an increase in the number of endovascular procedures. Endovascular procedures have been broadly incorporated into the practice of most vascular surgeons applying for recertification. The number of major open surgical cases reported by recent QE applicants has remained unchanged over the period of observation. For QE applicants, the number of endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs) has reached a plateau at approximately 50 cases, whereas the mean number of open infrarenal aneurysm repairs has decreased for both QE and RE applicants, reflecting national trends favoring EVAR. There was a significant association between case volume and performance on the QE but not on the RE.
Over the past 15 years, there has been a significant increase in the total number of operative cases reported to the VSB by both QE and RE applicants. Contrary to popular belief, the volume of major open vascular surgery reported by recent vascular surgery residents has remained relatively stable since 1994. Over the same time period, endovascular procedures have been rapidly incorporated into clinical practice by the majority of vascular surgeons applying for recertification by the VSB. Current vascular surgery residents receive a rich operative experience in both open and endovascular procedures that is reflective of contemporary practice.
美国外科学委员会血管外科学分会(VSB)旨在回答以下问题:当代血管外科学实践的范围是什么?当前的血管外科住院医师是否获得了适合其未来职业期望和成功获得委员会认证的培训?实践中的血管外科医生如何有效地将新兴技术和程序纳入实践?
我们分析了最近申请血管外科学资格考试(QE;2006-2009 年)的血管外科住院医师或申请血管外科学再认证考试(RE;1995-2009 年)向 VSB 提交的手术记录。检查了报告的手术经验与 QE 和 RE 表现之间的关系。
在过去的 15 年中,RE 和 QE 申请人报告的平均主要病例数增加了两倍,病例量的增加主要是由于腔内治疗数量的增加。腔内治疗已广泛纳入大多数申请再认证的血管外科医生的实践中。在观察期间,最近 QE 申请人报告的大型开放手术病例数量保持不变。对于 QE 申请人,血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)的数量已达到约 50 例的平台期,而 QE 和 RE 申请人的开放肾下型动脉瘤修复术的平均数量均有所减少,反映了国家倾向于 EVAR 的趋势。手术量与 QE 表现之间存在显著关联,但与 RE 无关。
在过去的 15 年中,QE 和 RE 申请人向 VSB 报告的手术总数显着增加。与普遍看法相反,自 1994 年以来,最近血管外科住院医师报告的大型开放血管手术数量相对稳定。在同一时期,大多数申请 VSB 再认证的血管外科医生迅速将腔内治疗纳入临床实践。当前的血管外科住院医师在开放和腔内手术方面都获得了丰富的手术经验,这反映了当代实践。