• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

溶栓治疗患者的卒中病因转归:描述性亚型分析。

Outcome by stroke etiology in patients receiving thrombolytic treatment: descriptive subtype analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Helsinki University, Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Stroke. 2011 Jan;42(1):102-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597534. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597534
PMID:21106955
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

treating ischemic stroke with thrombolytic therapy is effective and safe, but limited data exist on its efficacy and safety in different etiologic subtypes.

METHODS

patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis between 1995 and 2008 at our hospital were classified according to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria based on diagnostic evaluation. Clinical outcome of the stroke subtypes by 3-month modified Rankin Scale was compared by multivariate logistic regression. A good outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined according to both National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study criteria.

RESULTS

of the 957 eligible patients, 41% (389) had cardioembolisms, 23% (217) large-artery atherosclerosis, and 11% (101) small-vessel disease (SVD). A good outcome was more common in SVD than in the other subtypes. Patients with SVD were more often male (64% versus 54%), had a lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, lower mortality rate, and experienced no symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Patients with SVD had a prior stroke more often (20% versus 11%), whereas hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and transient ischemic attacks were equally distributed in all subtypes. Patients with SVD had a better outcome even after adjusting for baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and glucose level, age, and hyperdense artery sign (OR, 1.81; 1.01 to 3.23). In the adjusted multivariate model, other etiologic groups showed no significant correlation to good outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

patients with SVD were spared from bleeding complications and had the best outcome even after adjustment for confounding factors.

摘要

背景与目的

溶栓治疗缺血性脑卒中安全有效,但不同病因亚型的疗效和安全性数据有限。

方法

根据诊断评估,采用 Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment 标准,将 1995 年至 2008 年在我院接受静脉溶栓治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者分为不同亚型。采用多变量逻辑回归比较各亚型患者 3 个月时改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分的临床转归。良好转归定义为 mRS≤2。根据 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke 和 European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study 标准,定义症状性颅内出血。

结果

957 例符合条件的患者中,41%(389 例)为心源性栓塞,23%(217 例)为大动脉粥样硬化,11%(101 例)为小血管疾病(SVD)。SVD 患者的预后明显优于其他亚型。SVD 患者多为男性(64%比 54%),基线 NIHSS 评分较低,死亡率较低,未发生症状性颅内出血。SVD 患者既往卒中发生率较高(20%比 11%),高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症和短暂性脑缺血发作在各亚型中分布均衡。即使调整基线 NIHSS 评分和血糖水平、年龄和高密度动脉征后,SVD 患者的预后仍较好(OR 1.81,1.01 至 3.23)。在调整后的多变量模型中,其他病因组与良好预后无显著相关性。

结论

SVD 患者避免了出血并发症,即使在调整混杂因素后,其预后仍最佳。

相似文献

1
Outcome by stroke etiology in patients receiving thrombolytic treatment: descriptive subtype analysis.溶栓治疗患者的卒中病因转归:描述性亚型分析。
Stroke. 2011 Jan;42(1):102-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597534. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
2
Impact of admission glucose and diabetes on recanalization and outcome after intra-arterial thrombolysis for ischaemic stroke.入院时血糖及糖尿病对缺血性卒中动脉内溶栓后再通及预后的影响。
Int J Stroke. 2014 Dec;9(8):985-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00879.x. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
3
Outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in posterior versus anterior circulation stroke.静脉溶栓治疗后循环与前循环卒中的结局比较。
Stroke. 2011 Sep;42(9):2498-502. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.607614. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
4
Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke after recent transient ischemic attack.近期短暂性脑缺血发作后的急性缺血性脑卒中的溶栓治疗。
Int J Stroke. 2012 Apr;7(3):213-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00690.x. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
5
Magnetic resonance imaging-based versus computed tomography-based thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: comparison of safety and efficacy within a cohort study.基于磁共振成像的与基于计算机断层扫描的急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗:队列研究中的安全性和疗效比较。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(3):250-6. doi: 10.1159/000347071. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
6
COVID-19-related strokes are associated with increased mortality and morbidity: A multicenter comparative study from Bengaluru, South India.COVID-19 相关脑卒中与死亡率和发病率增加相关:来自印度南部班加罗尔的多中心对比研究。
Int J Stroke. 2021 Jun;16(4):429-436. doi: 10.1177/1747493020968236. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
7
Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke occurring during hospitalization for transient ischemic attack.短暂性脑缺血发作住院期间发生急性缺血性卒中的静脉溶栓治疗
Int J Stroke. 2014 Jun;9(4):413-8. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12125. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
8
Comparisons of outcomes in stroke subtypes after intravenous thrombolysis.静脉溶栓后卒中亚型的结局比较。
Springerplus. 2016 Jan 20;5:47. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1666-y. eCollection 2016.
9
Acute stroke intervention by interventional cardiologists.介入心脏病专家进行的急性中风干预。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr 1;73(5):692-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21927.
10
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Benefits of ESO stroke unit certification: A report from a Tertiary Stroke Center in Bucharest, Romania.欧洲卒中组织卒中单元认证的益处:来自罗马尼亚布加勒斯特一家三级卒中中心的报告。
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Apr 18:23969873251334285. doi: 10.1177/23969873251334285.
2
The effect of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients with unsuccessful thrombectomy.静脉溶栓对血管内血栓切除术失败的中风患者的影响。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 12:15910199241279009. doi: 10.1177/15910199241279009.
3
What You Always Wanted to Know about Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke but Never Dared to Ask: A Comprehensive Review.
你一直想了解但却不敢问的关于急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗的知识:一项综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 11;23(10):340. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2310340. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Intersecting Pathways: The Role of Metabolic Dysregulation, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, and Inflammation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Pathogenesis and Outcomes.交叉通路:代谢失调、胃肠道微生物群和炎症在急性缺血性中风发病机制及预后中的作用
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 21;13(14):4258. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144258.
5
Sex differences in etiology and short-term outcome in young ischemic stroke patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy.接受机械取栓治疗的年轻缺血性卒中患者病因及短期预后的性别差异
Neurol Res Pract. 2022 Oct 17;4(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s42466-022-00215-7.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Alteplase on Treatment of Acute Single Small Subcortical Infarction.阿替普酶治疗急性单个小皮质下梗死的疗效与安全性
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2022;19(3):255-266. doi: 10.2174/1567202619666220829111211.
7
The Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Caused by Large-Vessel Occlusion with Different Etiologies of Stroke: Data from ANGEL-ACT Registry.不同病因所致急性大动脉闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者血管内治疗的安全性和疗效:来自 ANGEL-ACT 登记研究的数据。
Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Mar;19(2):501-512. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01189-9. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
8
Hemispheric cerebral blood flow predicts outcome in acute small subcortical infarcts.半球性脑血流预测急性小皮质下梗死的转归。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021 Oct;41(10):2534-2545. doi: 10.1177/0271678X211029884. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous rtPA in Ischemic Strokes Due to Small-Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.小血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Stroke Res. 2021 Jun;12(3):406-415. doi: 10.1007/s12975-021-00890-9. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
10
Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Alteplase in Acute Lacunar Ischemic Stroke: The ENCHANTED Trial.急性腔隙性缺血性脑卒中患者应用小剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶溶栓治疗的效果对比:ENCHANTED 试验。
Neurology. 2021 Mar 16;96(11):e1512-e1526. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011598. Epub 2021 Feb 3.