L'Oreal Research and Innovation, Global Safety Evaluation, Asnières, France.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2011 Feb;49(2):324-41. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.11.022. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
The key issue of the safety assessment of botanical ingredients in personal care products (PCP) is the phytochemical characterisation of the plant source, data on contamination, adulteration and hazardous residues. The comparative approach used in the safety assessment of GM-plants may be applied to novel botanical PCP ingredients. Comparator(s) are the parent plant or varieties of the same species. Chemical grouping includes definition of chemical groups suitable for a read-across approach; it allows the estimation of toxicological endpoints on the basis of data from related substances (congeneric groups) with physical/chemical properties producing similar toxicities. The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) and Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) are tools for the assessment of trace substances or minor ingredients. The evaluation of skin penetration of substances present in human food is unnecessary, whereas mixtures may be assessed on the basis of physical/chemical properties of individual substances. Adverse dermal effects of botanicals include irritation, sensitisation, phototoxicity and immediate-type allergy. The experience from dietary supplements or herbal medicines showed that being natural is not equivalent to being safe. Pragmatic approaches for quality and safety standards of botanical ingredients are needed; consumer safety should be the first objective of conventional and botanical PCP ingredients.
个人护理产品 (PCP) 中植物成分的安全性评估的关键问题是植物来源的植物化学特征、污染、掺假和有害残留的数据。在 GM 植物的安全性评估中使用的比较方法可应用于新型植物 PCP 成分。对照物是同一物种的亲本植物或品种。化学分组包括适合类推方法的化学组的定义;它允许根据具有产生相似毒性的物理/化学性质的相关物质(同系物组)的数据来估计毒理学终点。毒理学关注阈值 (TTC) 和皮肤致敏阈值 (DST) 是评估痕量物质或次要成分的工具。评估存在于人类食物中的物质的皮肤穿透性是不必要的,而混合物可以根据个别物质的物理/化学性质进行评估。植物的不良皮肤影响包括刺激、致敏、光毒性和立即型过敏。膳食补充剂或草药的经验表明,天然并不等同于安全。需要针对植物成分的质量和安全标准制定务实的方法;消费者安全应该是传统和植物 PCP 成分的首要目标。