Suppr超能文献

核基质蛋白 22 尿标记物和尿脱落细胞学在膀胱癌检测中的性能。

Performance of nuclear matrix protein 22 urine marker and voided urine cytology in the detection of urinary bladder tumors.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Feb;49(2):311-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.038. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cystoscopy with urinary cytology is the gold standard for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with tumors of the urinary bladder. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) tumor marker test, BladderChek® point-of-care test and voided urinary cytology for the detection and follow-up of bladder tumors.

METHODS

NMP22 was measured using an ELISA assay in stabilized voided urine and using the BladderChek® test. Voided urinary cytology was performed on urine samples. Results were compared to cystoscopic findings and histopathological examination results after transurethral resection of the bladder lesion.

RESULTS

For the prediction of malignant histopathological result, sensitivity and specificity were 45.2% and 75.0%, respectively, for NMP22 at a cut-off of 7.5 kU/L, 17.7% and 100% for the BladderChek® test and 37.0% and 100% for voided urine cytology. For the prediction of suspicious or positive cystoscopic finding, sensitivity and specificity were 40.4% and 72.1%, respectively, for NMP22 at a cut-off of 7.5 kU/L, 14.8% and 93.8% for the BladderChek® test and 26.8% and 98.1% for voided urine cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

The NMP22 quantitative test showed higher sensitivity and lower specificity compared with voided urine cytology, whereas the sensitivity of the BladderChek® test was low. We could not recommend any of the three non-invasive tests as a replacement for cystoscopy for the diagnosis or follow-up of urinary bladder tumors.

摘要

背景

膀胱镜检查联合尿细胞学检查是诊断和随访膀胱癌患者的金标准。本研究旨在评估核基质蛋白 22(NMP22)肿瘤标志物检测、BladderChek®即时检测和尿脱落细胞学检查在膀胱癌检测和随访中的应用价值。

方法

采用 ELISA 法检测稳定尿液中的 NMP22,并用 BladderChek®检测试剂盒进行检测。对尿液标本进行尿脱落细胞学检查。结果与经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的膀胱镜检查结果和组织病理学检查结果进行比较。

结果

对于预测恶性组织学结果,NMP22 的截断值为 7.5 kU/L 时,其灵敏度和特异性分别为 45.2%和 75.0%,BladderChek®试验的灵敏度和特异性分别为 17.7%和 100.0%,尿脱落细胞学检查的灵敏度和特异性分别为 37.0%和 100.0%。对于预测可疑或阳性膀胱镜检查结果,NMP22 的截断值为 7.5 kU/L 时,其灵敏度和特异性分别为 40.4%和 72.1%,BladderChek®试验的灵敏度和特异性分别为 14.8%和 93.8%,尿脱落细胞学检查的灵敏度和特异性分别为 26.8%和 98.1%。

结论

与尿脱落细胞学检查相比,NMP22 定量检测的灵敏度更高,特异性更低,而 BladderChek®试验的灵敏度较低。我们不能推荐这三种非侵入性检测中的任何一种来替代膀胱镜检查,用于膀胱癌的诊断或随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验