Suppr超能文献

即使手术质量标准化,淋巴结比率除了美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)的 N 分期外,还能为黑色素瘤患者提供预后信息。

Lymph node ratio provides prognostic information in addition to american joint committee on cancer N stage in patients with melanoma, even if quality of surgery is standardized.

机构信息

Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2011 Jan;253(1):109-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f9b8b6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether lymph node ratio (LNR) gives additional prognostic information to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N stage in a melanoma treatment center where regional lymph node dissection (RLND) techniques are standardized.

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio is the ratio of involved lymph nodes to total number of lymph nodes removed at RLND. It is a predictor of survival for melanoma patients. One possible explanation of this is variation in surgical quality.

METHODS

Regional lymph node dissection procedures performed between 1993 and 2006 were identified from a prospective melanoma database. Patients having axilla, groin, and neck (≥ 4 levels) RLNDs were allocated to both AJCC N stage groupings and LNR groupings using thresholds A 10% and less, B more than 10% to 25%, and C more than 25%.

RESULTS

Lymph nodes retrieval for surgeons was equivalent or exceeded existing standards. For all RLNDs combined (n = 1514) and for the separate regions N1 and LNR A, N2 and LNR B, and N3 and LNR C all had similar numbers of patients allocated to each group with similar survival. The significant factors on multivariate analysis were LNR, primary melanoma Breslow thickness (but only when assessing AJCC stage T0-T3 vs T4), ulceration, AJCC N stage, age less than 50 years/50 years and more, and lymph node basin (groin better than axilla and neck). Lymph node ratio also allowed substaging of AJCC stage N3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized techniques for RLNDs result in LNR and AJCC N stage having similar percentages of cases in each grouping with similar survival. However, LNR is still an independent predictor in prognosis in these melanoma patients. Substaging may account for some of these observations.

摘要

目的

探讨在一个区域淋巴结清扫(RLND)技术标准化的黑色素瘤治疗中心,淋巴结比率(LNR)是否比美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)N 期提供更多预后信息。

背景

LNR 是受累淋巴结与 RLND 切除的总淋巴结数的比值。它是黑色素瘤患者生存的预测指标。其可能的解释之一是手术质量的差异。

方法

从一个前瞻性黑色素瘤数据库中确定了 1993 年至 2006 年期间进行的 RLND 手术。将行腋窝、腹股沟和颈部(≥4 个水平)RLND 的患者根据 AJCC N 分期分组和 LNR 分组,使用阈值 A(<10%)、B(10%-25%)和 C(>25%)。

结果

外科医生的淋巴结检出量相当于或超过了现有标准。对于所有 RLND(n=1514)以及单独的 N1 和 LNR A、N2 和 LNR B 和 N3 和 LNR C 区域,每个组的患者分配数量相似,生存情况相似。多变量分析的显著因素是 LNR、原发黑色素瘤 Breslow 厚度(但仅在评估 AJCC 分期 T0-T3 与 T4 时)、溃疡、AJCC N 分期、年龄<50 岁/50 岁及以上和淋巴结区域(腹股沟优于腋窝和颈部)。LNR 还允许 AJCC N3 患者亚分期。

结论

RLND 的标准化技术导致 LNR 和 AJCC N 期在每个分组中的病例百分比相似,生存情况相似。然而,LNR 仍然是这些黑色素瘤患者预后的独立预测指标。亚分期可能解释了这些观察结果的一部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验